Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
20082.1k citationsMary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman et al.Journal of Accounting Researchprofile →
The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view
20011.2k citationsMary E. Barth, William H. Beaver et al.Journal of Accounting and Economicsprofile →
Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets
2001757 citationsMary E. Barth, Ron Kasznik et al.Journal of Accounting Researchprofile →
Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health
1998719 citationsMary E. Barth, William H. Beaver et al.Journal of Accounting and Economicsprofile →
Market Rewards Associated with Patterns of Increasing Earnings
1999692 citationsMary E. Barth, John A. Elliott et al.Journal of Accounting Researchprofile →
Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows
2001675 citationsMary E. Barth et al.The Accounting Reviewprofile →
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
2009646 citationsMary E. Barth et al.The Accounting Reviewprofile →
Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable?
2012556 citationsMary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman et al.Journal of Accounting and Economicsprofile →
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
2005535 citationsMary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman et al.SSRN Electronic Journalprofile →
Fair Value Accounting: Evidence from Investment Securities and the Market Valuation of Banks.
1994527 citationsMary E. BarthThe Accounting Reviewprofile →
How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?
2010355 citationsMary E. Barth, Wayne R. LandsmanEuropean Accounting Reviewprofile →
Evolution in Value Relevance of Accounting Information
2022104 citationsMary E. Barth et al.The Accounting Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Barth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Barth. The network helps show where Mary E. Barth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Barth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Barth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Barth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Barth. Mary E. Barth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barth, Mary E., Steven F. Cahan, Lily Chen, & Elmar R. Venter. (2015). The Economic Consequences Associated with Integrated Report Quality: Early Evidence from a Mandatory Setting. SSRN Electronic Journal.32 indexed citations
Barth, Mary E. & Wayne R. Landsman. (2010). How did Financial Reporting Contribute to the Financial Crisis?. European Accounting Review. 19(3). 399–423.355 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Barth, Mary E., Leslie D. Hodder, & Stephen Stubben. (2008). Fair Value Accounting for Liabilities and Own Credit Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal.28 indexed citations
8.
Barth, Mary E., Wayne R. Landsman, & Mark H. Lang. (2008). International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research. 46(3). 467–498.2075 indexed citations breakdown →
Huddart, Steven J., Mary E. Barth, Anne Beatty, et al.. (2006). INFORMATION ASYMMETRY AND CROSS-SECTION VARIATION IN INSIDER TRADING†. SSRN Electronic Journal.25 indexed citations
11.
Aboody, David, Mary E. Barth, & Ron Kasznik. (2003). Firms' Voluntary Recognition of Stock-Based Compensation Expense. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
12.
Barth, Mary E.. (2003). Discussion of 'Compensation Policy and Discretionary Disclosure'. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Barth, Mary E.. (2000). Valuation-based Accounting Research: Implications for Financial Reporting and Opportunities for Future Research. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
15.
Aboody, David, Mary E. Barth, & Ron Kasznik. (1998). Revaluations of Fixed Assets and Future Firm Performance: Evidence from the U.K.. SSRN Electronic Journal.47 indexed citations
Barth, Mary E. & Greg Clinch. (1996). International Accounting Differences and Their Relation to Share Prices: Evidence from U.K., Australian, and Canadian Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
18.
Barth, Mary E., et al.. (1995). Market Rewards Associated with Increasing Earnings Patterns. SSRN Electronic Journal.25 indexed citations
19.
Barth, Mary E. & Amy P. Hutton. (1995). Differential Information Environments: Effects on Cost of Capital and Reflection in Share Prices of Recognized and Disclosed Accounting Amounts. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
20.
Barth, Mary E.. (1994). Fair Value Accounting: Evidence from Investment Securities and the Market Valuation of Banks.. The Accounting Review. 69(1). 1–25.527 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.