Mary C. Byrne

727 total citations
9 papers, 595 citations indexed

About

Mary C. Byrne is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary C. Byrne has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 595 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Cell Biology and 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mary C. Byrne's work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (3 papers). Mary C. Byrne is often cited by papers focused on Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (3 papers). Mary C. Byrne collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Mary C. Byrne's co-authors include James O McNamara, Richard M. Dasheiff, John Fitz, Robert W. Ledeen, Glee Yorke, Fred J. Roisen, William T. Norton, Dennis A. Aquino, Muhammad Farooq and M. Sensenbrenner and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Biochemistry, Brain Research and Journal of Neurochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mary C. Byrne

9 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary C. Byrne United States	8	356	345	98	94	91	9	595
Brian R. Pearce United Kingdom	10	365 1.0×	425 1.2×	29 0.3×	90 1.0×	120 1.3×	13	629
Frédéric Dessi France	15	543 1.5×	499 1.4×	62 0.6×	47 0.5×	80 0.9×	23	927
Bjørg Roberg Norway	14	436 1.2×	342 1.0×	42 0.4×	65 0.7×	37 0.4×	22	790
E.A. Proper Netherlands	7	367 1.0×	393 1.1×	40 0.4×	206 2.2×	63 0.7×	8	706
O. S. J�rgensen Denmark	8	214 0.6×	266 0.8×	36 0.4×	36 0.4×	42 0.5×	12	489
Catrin Wernicke Germany	18	246 0.7×	249 0.7×	92 0.9×	46 0.5×	20 0.2×	27	616
Mona J. Law United States	10	384 1.1×	373 1.1×	64 0.7×	23 0.2×	34 0.4×	12	713
Paul M. Lea United States	10	307 0.9×	335 1.0×	95 1.0×	25 0.3×	41 0.5×	11	597
Shigeyuki Nonaka Japan	6	286 0.8×	301 0.9×	32 0.3×	237 2.5×	30 0.3×	6	675
Uta Strasser United States	11	499 1.4×	563 1.6×	72 0.7×	25 0.3×	39 0.4×	13	852

Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Byrne

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Byrne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Byrne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Byrne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Byrne

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Byrne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Byrne. The network helps show where Mary C. Byrne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary C. Byrne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary C. Byrne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary C. Byrne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary C. Byrne. Mary C. Byrne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dreyfus, H., William T. Norton, M. Sensenbrenner, et al.. (1988). Gangliosides of cultured astroglia. Brain Research. 461(1). 98–106. 42 indexed citations

2.

Byrne, Mary C., et al.. (1988). Ganglioside content of astroglia and neurons isolated from maturing rat brain: consideration of the source of astroglial gangliosides. Brain Research. 461(1). 87–97. 40 indexed citations

3.

Margolis, R. U., et al.. (1987). Complex Carbohydrate Composition of Large Dense‐Cored Vesicles from Sympathetic Nerve. Journal of Neurochemistry. 49(6). 1839–1844. 12 indexed citations

4.

Byrne, Mary C., et al.. (1985). Procedure for isolation of gangliosides in high yield and purity: Simultaneous isolation of neutral glycosphingolipids. Analytical Biochemistry. 148(1). 163–173. 51 indexed citations

5.

Byrne, Mary C., et al.. (1983). Ganglioside‐Induced Neuritogenesis: Verification That Gangliosides Are the Active Agents, and Comparison of Molecular Species. Journal of Neurochemistry. 41(5). 1214–1222. 129 indexed citations

6.

Byrne, Mary C. & Robert W. Ledeen. (1983). Regional variation of brain gangliosides in feline GM1 gangliosidosis. Experimental Neurology. 81(1). 210–225. 6 indexed citations

7.

Dasheiff, Richard M., et al.. (1981). Biochemical evidence of decreased muscarinic cholinergic neuronal communication following amygdala-kindled seizures. Brain Research. 206(1). 233–238. 26 indexed citations

8.

Byrne, Mary C., et al.. (1980). Amygdala kindling induces muscarinic cholinergic receptor declines in a highly specific distribution within the limbic system. Experimental Neurology. 69(1). 85–98. 41 indexed citations

9.

McNamara, James O, Mary C. Byrne, Richard M. Dasheiff, & John Fitz. (1980). The kindling model of epilepsy: A review. Progress in Neurobiology. 15(2). 139–159. 248 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact