Mary Ann Allison

1.3k total citations
16 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

Mary Ann Allison is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Hematology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Ann Allison has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Cancer Research and 2 papers in Hematology. Recurrent topics in Mary Ann Allison's work include HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Mary Ann Allison is often cited by papers focused on HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). Mary Ann Allison collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Italy. Mary Ann Allison's co-authors include John A. Glaspy, Robert M. Elashoff, Helena R. Chang, Jeffrey Gornbein, Henri Roché, Fang Fang, Mario Campone, Dale E. Shuster, Thomas Bachelot and J. Wanders and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Mary Ann Allison

11 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Mary Ann Allison
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Oncology 371
  • Cancer Research 182
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 66
  • Immunology 47
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 45
Replace Patricia Tresca with:
Patricia Tresca France
Pralay Mukhopadhyay United States
Mirat Shah United States
Lucía Inglada‐Pérez Spain
Daniel J. Kelley United States
Carlos Shimizu Japan
Wencheng Zhao China
Esha Jain United States
Kristen Wolslegel United States
Patrik Hesselius Sweden
Patricia Tresca France View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mary Ann Allison
Mary Ann Allison · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mary Ann Allison
Mary Ann Allison · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Ann Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Ann Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Ann Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Ann Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Ann Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Ann Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Ann Allison. The network helps show where Mary Ann Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Ann Allison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Ann Allison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Ann Allison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Ann Allison. Mary Ann Allison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 7
2 92
3 1
4 83
5 2
6 164
7
Roundtable Discussion Examining Ritual, Technology, and Community in Urban Communication
0
8 13
9 0
10 7
11 1
12
The Complexity Advantage: How the Science of Complexity Can Help Your Business Achieve Peak Performance
77
13 4
14 32
15 57
16
Managing Up, Managing Down
0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026