Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Flexible mechanical metamaterials
20171.3k citationsKatia Bertoldi, Vincenzo Vitelli et al.Nature Reviews Materialsprofile →
3D metamaterials
2019800 citationsMuamer Kadic, Graeme W. Milton et al.Nature Reviews Physicsprofile →
Programmable Mechanical Metamaterials
2014495 citationsBastiaan Florijn, Corentin Coulais et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials
2016328 citationsCorentin Coulais, Martin van Hecke et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Martin van Hecke
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin van Hecke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin van Hecke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin van Hecke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin van Hecke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin van Hecke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin van Hecke. The network helps show where Martin van Hecke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin van Hecke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin van Hecke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin van Hecke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Martin van Hecke. Martin van Hecke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kadic, Muamer, Graeme W. Milton, Martin van Hecke, & Martin Wegener. (2019). 3D metamaterials. Nature Reviews Physics. 1(3). 198–210.800 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Bertoldi, Katia, Vincenzo Vitelli, Johan Christensen, & Martin van Hecke. (2017). Flexible mechanical metamaterials. Nature Reviews Materials. 2(11).1295 indexed citations breakdown →
Reis, Pedro M., Heinrich M. Jaeger, & Martin van Hecke. (2015). Designer Matter: A perspective. Extreme Mechanics Letters. 5. 25–29.70 indexed citations
Dagois-Bohy, Simon, Brian P. Tighe, Ellák Somfai, & Martin van Hecke. (2013). Oscillatory Rheology near Jamming. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013.1 indexed citations
17.
Gómez, Leopoldo R., et al.. (2011). Shock Waves in Jammed Solids. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2011.1 indexed citations
18.
Somfai, Ellák, Martin van Hecke, Wouter G. Ellenbroek, & Wim van Saarloos. (2006). Emergence of a critical scale in jamming of frictional grains. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
19.
Saarloos, Wim van, Ellák Somfai, Jean-Noël Roux, Jacobus Hendrikus Snoeijer, & Martin van Hecke. (2005). Wave propagation in confined granular systems. Physical Review E. 72. 21301.14 indexed citations
20.
Bohr, Tomas, Martin van Hecke, René Mikkelsen, & Mads Ipsen. (2000). On universality in transitions to spatio-temporal chaos. arXiv (Cornell University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.