Martin van der Ent
- Surgery top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Corstiaan A. den UilPatrick W. SerruysRon T. van DomburgMaarten L. SimoonsWim K. LagrandPeter E. SpronkLucia S.D. JewbaliJin Cheng
- Topics
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (36 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers)Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Martin van der Ent
61 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Surgery 1.5k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.1k
- Biomedical Engineering 599
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 478
- Emergency Medicine 371
Countries citing papers authored by Martin van der Ent
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin van der Ent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin van der Ent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin van der Ent more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin van der Ent
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin van der Ent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin van der Ent. The network helps show where Martin van der Ent may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin van der Ent
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin van der Ent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin van der Ent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin van der Ent. Martin van der Ent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Martin van der Ent
Martin van der Ent is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (36 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.1k citations), Emergency Medicine (371 citations) and Surgery (1.5k citations). Martin van der Ent has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Corstiaan A. den Uil, Patrick W. Serruys, Ron T. van Domburg, Maarten L. Simoons, Wim K. Lagrand, Peter E. Spronk, Lucia S.D. Jewbali, Jin Cheng, Sanne E. Hoeks and Evelyn Regar. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.