Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4
2016288 citationsJoseph A. M. Paddison, Marcus Daum et al.Nature Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Mourigal
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Mourigal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Mourigal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Mourigal more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Mourigal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Mourigal. The network helps show where Martin Mourigal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Mourigal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Mourigal.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Mourigal based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Mourigal. Martin Mourigal is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zhang, Hao, Steven Hahn, Daniel M. Pajerowski, et al.. (2025). Sunny.jl: A Julia Package for Spin Dynamics. The Journal of Open Source Software. 10(116). 8138–8138.1 indexed citations
Mahmood, Fahad, Marcus Daum, Zhiling Dun, et al.. (2019). Hierarchy of Exchange Interactions in the Triangular-Lattice Spin Liquid YbMgGaO 4. arXiv (Cornell University). 2018.2 indexed citations
14.
Mourigal, Martin, Xiaojian Bai, Joseph A. M. Paddison, et al.. (2019). Magnetic excitations of the classical spin-liquid MgCr 2 O 4. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2019.2 indexed citations
15.
Cunningham, William, et al.. (2018). Observation of a Quantum Dipole Liquid State in an Organic Quasi-Two-Dimensional Material. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018.
16.
Kamiya, Yoshitomo, Lei Ge, Tao Hong, et al.. (2017). Role of Quantum Fluctuations in Ba$_3$CoSb$_2$O$_9$ Revealed by Excitations within the 1/3-Magnetization Plateau. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
17.
Ge, L., Yoshitomo Kamiya, Clarina dela Cruz, et al.. (2017). Ba8CoNb6O24: A Spin-1/2 Triangular-Lattice Heisenberg Antiferromagnet in the Two-Dimensional Limit. Physical Review B. 95(6). 5.4 indexed citations
18.
Paddison, Joseph A. M., Marcus Daum, Zhiling Dun, et al.. (2016). Continuous excitations of the triangular-lattice quantum spin liquid YbMgGaO4. Nature Physics. 13(2). 117–122.288 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
MacLaughlin, D. E., O. O. Bernal, Martin Mourigal, et al.. (2015). 充填金属パイロクロアPr 2+x Ir 2-x O 7-δ での不安定スピンアイス秩序. Physical Review B. 92(5). 1–54432.4 indexed citations
20.
Mourigal, Martin, Siân E. Dutton, C. Broholm, et al.. (2012). Quantum spin liquid in frustrated one dimensional LiCuSbO$_4$. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2012.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.