Martin Hilbert
About
In The Last Decade
Martin Hilbert
79 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Sociology and Political Science 597
- Information Systems 589
- Artificial Intelligence 406
- Communication 394
- Media Technology 318
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Hilbert
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Hilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Hilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Hilbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Hilbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Hilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Hilbert. The network helps show where Martin Hilbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Hilbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Hilbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Hilbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Hilbert. Martin Hilbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | AI4D: Artificial Intelligence for Development | 5 |
| 5 | The online job market trace in Latin America and the Caribbean | 2 |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | A Review of Large-Scale "How Much Information?" Inventories: Variations, Achievements and Challenges. | 2 |
| 8 | Eric Schmidt & Jared Cohen, The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business | 1 |
| 9 | Toward a Conceptual Framework for ICT for Development: Lessons Learned from the Cube Framework Used in Latin America (English) | 4 |
| 10 | Info Capacity| How to Measure the World’s Technological Capacity to Communicate, Store and Compute Information? Part I: Results and Scope | 4 |
| 11 | Info Capacity| How to Measure the World’s Technological Capacity to Communicate, Store and Compute Information? Part II: Measurement Unit and Conclusions | 1 |
| 12 | Info Capacity| Introduction—How to Measure “How Much Information”? | 1 |
| 13 | Hacia un Marco Conceptual para las TIC para El Desarrollo: Lecciones Aprendidas del “Cubo” Latinoamericano (Español) | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Mapping the Dimensions and Characteristics of the World’s Technological Communication Capacity During the Period of Digitization (1986-2007/2010) | 7 |
| 16 | The Manifold Definitions of the Digital Divide and Their Diverse Implications for Policy Responsibility | 3 |
| 17 | Information societies in Latin America and the Caribbean: development of techonologies and technologies for development | 7 |
| 18 | Towards a conceptual framework for ICT for Development: lessons learned from Latin America | 1 |
| 19 | Centros de acceso público a las tecnologías de información y comunicación en América Latina: características y desafíos | 5 |
| 20 | Estrategias nacionales para la sociedad de la información en América Latina y el Caribe | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.