Martijn Ketelaars

1.4k total citations
16 papers, 569 citations indexed

About

Martijn Ketelaars is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, Martijn Ketelaars has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 569 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Oncology and 6 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in Martijn Ketelaars's work include Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (6 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers). Martijn Ketelaars is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (6 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (6 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers). Martijn Ketelaars collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Austria. Martijn Ketelaars's co-authors include Ina M. Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Uulke A. van der Heide, Carien L. Creutzberg, L. van de Bunt, G.A.P. de Kort, M.S. Laman, Remi A. Nout, E.C. Rijkmans, Karen J. Neelis and I. Rutten and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and European Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Martijn Ketelaars

15 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Martijn Ketelaars Netherlands 10 315 243 177 155 107 16 569
Hajo Dirk Weitmann Austria 8 551 1.7× 295 1.2× 151 0.9× 101 0.7× 16 0.1× 11 633
Geetha Menon Canada 10 129 0.4× 90 0.4× 234 1.3× 146 0.9× 35 0.3× 34 367
Subhakar Mutyala United States 13 153 0.5× 159 0.7× 200 1.1× 91 0.6× 9 0.1× 43 525
José Garcia-Ramirez United States 11 70 0.2× 61 0.3× 146 0.8× 206 1.3× 64 0.6× 34 380
Concetta Laliscia Italy 11 127 0.4× 114 0.5× 47 0.3× 35 0.2× 15 0.1× 39 327
Lluís Escudé Switzerland 12 75 0.2× 91 0.4× 257 1.5× 102 0.7× 39 0.4× 18 398
Noha Jastaniyah Saudi Arabia 8 225 0.7× 148 0.6× 101 0.6× 83 0.5× 3 0.0× 15 357
M.A. Samuels United States 10 131 0.4× 41 0.2× 188 1.1× 158 1.0× 5 0.0× 15 448
Adam Dickler United States 17 72 0.2× 190 0.8× 452 2.6× 181 1.2× 3 0.0× 46 702
Andrea D’Aviero Italy 10 39 0.1× 57 0.2× 63 0.4× 104 0.7× 14 0.1× 42 307

Countries citing papers authored by Martijn Ketelaars

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martijn Ketelaars's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martijn Ketelaars with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martijn Ketelaars more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martijn Ketelaars

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martijn Ketelaars. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martijn Ketelaars. The network helps show where Martijn Ketelaars may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martijn Ketelaars

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martijn Ketelaars. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martijn Ketelaars based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martijn Ketelaars. Martijn Ketelaars is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Ketelaars, Martijn, M. Sprenger, Annemieke Bos, et al.. (2025). The impact of parental adverse childhood experiences on children’s healthcare utilisation: a systematic review. medRxiv.
2.
Fijten, Rianne, Liesbeth Boersma, Petros Kalendralis, et al.. (2023). External validation of a prediction model for timely implementation of innovations in radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 179. 109459–109459. 3 indexed citations
3.
Rijkmans, E.C., Akin Inderson, Ellen M. Kerkhof, et al.. (2019). EUS-guided fiducial marker placement for radiotherapy in rectal cancer: feasibility of two placement strategies and four fiducial types. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(11). E1357–E1364. 7 indexed citations
4.
Rijkmans, E.C., Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Baukelien van Triest, et al.. (2019). Predictive factors for response and toxicity after brachytherapy for rectal cancer; results from the HERBERT study. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 133. 176–182. 18 indexed citations
5.
Marinkovic, Marina, Nanda Horeweg, M.S. Laman, et al.. (2017). Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for iris and iridociliary melanomas. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 102(8). 1154–1159. 14 indexed citations
6.
Rijkmans, E.C., Ellen M. Kerkhof, Remi A. Nout, et al.. (2017). Benefit of adaptive CT-based treatment planning in high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy for rectal cancer. Brachytherapy. 17(1). 78–85. 4 indexed citations
7.
Rijkmans, E.C., Annemieke Cats, Remi A. Nout, et al.. (2017). Endorectal Brachytherapy Boost After External Beam Radiation Therapy in Elderly or Medically Inoperable Patients With Rectal Cancer: Primary Outcomes of the Phase 1 HERBERT Study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 98(4). 908–917. 48 indexed citations
8.
Marinkovic, Marina, Nanda Horeweg, Marta Fiocco, et al.. (2016). Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma without transpupillary thermotherapy: Similar efficacy with improved visual outcome. European Journal of Cancer. 68. 106–113. 25 indexed citations
9.
Cats, Annemieke, Karen J. Neelis, Yvette M. van der Linden, et al.. (2014). OC-0497: Feasibility study of external beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy in inoperable rectal cancer patients. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 111. S194–S195. 1 indexed citations
10.
Rijkmans, E.C., Remi A. Nout, I. Rutten, et al.. (2014). Improved survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy compared with conventional brachytherapy. Gynecologic Oncology. 135(2). 231–238. 182 indexed citations
11.
Nomden, C., Astrid A.C. de Leeuw, Erik Van Limbergen, et al.. (2012). Multicentre treatment planning study of MRI-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Comparison between tandem-ovoid applicator users. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 107(1). 82–87. 16 indexed citations
12.
Keunen, Jan E.E., et al.. (2010). Ruthenium plaque radiation therapy for iris and iridociliary melanomas. Acta Ophthalmologica. 90(3). 291–296. 20 indexed citations
13.
Creutzberg, Carien L., et al.. (2010). Long-term outcomes of eye-conserving treatment with Ruthenium106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 95(3). 332–338. 53 indexed citations
14.
Nkiwane, Karen, Elena Fidarova, Christian Kirisits, et al.. (2010). DVH Report on an International Study on MRI-Guided Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (EMBRACE). Brachytherapy. 9. S24–S24. 16 indexed citations
15.
Bunt, L. van de, Uulke A. van der Heide, Martijn Ketelaars, G.A.P. de Kort, & Ina M. Jürgenliemk‐Schulz. (2005). Conventional, conformal, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning of external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer: The impact of tumor regression. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 64(1). 189–196. 161 indexed citations
16.
Bunt, L. van de, et al.. (2005). Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) for Cervical Cancer: The Impact of Tumor Regression and Internal Organ Motion. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 63. S343–S343. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hajo Dirk Weitmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Geetha Menon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Subhakar Mutyala Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José Garcia-Ramirez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Concetta Laliscia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lluís Escudé Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Noha Jastaniyah Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.A. Samuels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adam Dickler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea D’Aviero
Rankless by CCL
2026