Geetha Menon

1.3k total citations
34 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

Geetha Menon is a scholar working on Radiation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Geetha Menon has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Radiation, 13 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 11 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Geetha Menon's work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (20 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (8 papers). Geetha Menon is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (20 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (8 papers). Geetha Menon collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Geetha Menon's co-authors include Ron S. Sloboda, Delia Pudney, Wendy Smith, Nathan Wolfe, Theresa Trotter, Kari Tanderup, Gerry Lowe, Jacob Christian Lindegaard, Robert Hudej and Christian Kirisits and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

In The Last Decade

Geetha Menon

32 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Geetha Menon

RADIA

RNMI

PRM

SURGE

Rachel Wills United Kingdom

Hajo Dirk Weitmann Austria

Ramin Jaberi Iran

Dae Yup Han United States

Keith Sowards United States

Hee Rim Nam South Korea

Goro Kasuya Japan

Michael C. Kirk United States

Kent A. Gifford United States

Sivalee Suriyapee Thailand

Rachel Wills United Kingdom

Geetha Menon

214 ×0.9

RADIA

148 ×1.0

RNMI

248 ×1.9

90 ×0.7

PRM

165 ×1.8

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to Geetha Menon Geetha Menon (= 1×) peers Rachel Wills

Countries citing papers authored by Geetha Menon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geetha Menon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geetha Menon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geetha Menon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geetha Menon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geetha Menon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geetha Menon. The network helps show where Geetha Menon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geetha Menon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geetha Menon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geetha Menon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geetha Menon. Geetha Menon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Menon, Geetha, et al.. (2024). Incidence of Strabismus Post–Plaque Brachytherapy in Patients With Uveal Melanoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 262. 161–169.

Weis, Ezekiel, Thomas G. Salopek, Tina Cheng, et al.. (2023). Management of Uveal Melanoma: Updated Cancer Care Alberta Clinical Practice Guideline. Current Oncology. 31(1). 24–41. 8 indexed citations

Menon, Geetha, et al.. (2023). 210 Contour Agreement? Accuracy? What About a Dosimetric Perspective on When Millimeters Matter in Cervix External Beam Radiotherapy?. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 186. S92–S92.

Menon, Geetha, Christopher G. Thomas, Young Lee, et al.. (2023). A First Look at Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion of Canadian Medical Physicists: Results From the 2021 COMP EDI Climate Survey. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 116(2). 305–313. 6 indexed citations

Warkentin, Brad, et al.. (2022). BAIRDA: a novel in vitro setup to quantify radiobiological parameters for cervical cancer brachytherapy dose estimations. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 67(4). 45012–45012. 3 indexed citations

Menon, Geetha, et al.. (2022). Brachytherapy workflow for locally advanced cervical cancer: A survey of Canadian Medical Physicists. Brachytherapy. 21(4). 405–414. 5 indexed citations

Jamaluddin, Muhammad, et al.. (2021). Recurrent radiation recall dermatitis 40 years after radiation therapy for breast cancer. The Breast Journal. 27(6). 543–546. 3 indexed citations

Serban, Monica, Christian Kirisits, Astrid de Leeuw, et al.. (2020). Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 106(5). 1052–1062. 60 indexed citations

Berger, Thomas, Yvette Seppenwoolde, Richard Pötter, et al.. (2019). Importance of Technique, Target Selection, Contouring, Dose Prescription, and Dose-Planning in External Beam Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Evolution of Practice From EMBRACE-I to II. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 104(4). 885–894. 37 indexed citations

10.

Serban, Monica, Christian Kirisits, Richard Pötter, et al.. (2018). Isodose surface volumes in cervix cancer brachytherapy: Change of practice from standard (Point A) to individualized image guided adaptive (EMBRACE I) brachytherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 129(3). 567–574. 29 indexed citations

11.

Sloboda, Ron S., et al.. (2017). Experimental assessment of the Advanced Collapsed-cone Engine for scalp brachytherapy treatments. Brachytherapy. 17(2). 489–499. 5 indexed citations

12.

Menon, Geetha, et al.. (2016). Delivered dose uncertainty analysis at the tumor apex for ocular brachytherapy. Medical Physics. 43(8Part1). 4891–4902. 8 indexed citations

13.

Menon, Geetha, Fleur Huang, Ron S. Sloboda, R. Pearcey, & Sunita Ghosh. (2014). Practically achievable maximum high-risk clinical target volume doses in MRI-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: A planning study. Brachytherapy. 13(6). 572–578. 2 indexed citations

14.

Menon, Geetha, et al.. (2013). Comparative evaluation of two dose optimization methods for image-guided, highly-conformal, tandem and ovoids cervix brachytherapy planning. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 58(7). 2045–2058. 3 indexed citations

15.

Menon, Geetha, Delia Pudney, & Wendy Smith. (2011). Dosimetric evaluation of breast radiotherapy in a dynamic phantom. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 56(23). 7405–7418. 7 indexed citations

16.

Smith, Wendy, et al.. (2010). IMRT for the breast: a comparison of tangential planning techniques. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 55(4). 1231–1241. 43 indexed citations

17.

Menon, Geetha & Ron S. Sloboda. (2004). Compensator thickness verification using ana-Si EPID. Medical Physics. 31(8). 2300–2312. 4 indexed citations

18.

Menon, Geetha & Ron S. Sloboda. (2004). Quality assurance measurements of a-si epid performance. Medical dosimetry. 29(1). 11–17. 29 indexed citations

19.

Menon, Geetha & Ron S. Sloboda. (2000). Measurement of relative output for 90Sr ophthalmic applicators using radiochromic film. Medical dosimetry. 25(3). 171–177. 9 indexed citations

20.

Sloboda, Ron S. & Geetha Menon. (2000). Experimental determination of the anisotropy function and anisotropy factor for model 6711 I‐125 seeds. Medical Physics. 27(8). 1789–1799. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact