Martha H. Roper
- Endocrinology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Health top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jos VandelaerFrançois GasseJoy E LawnHannah BlencoweSimon CousensGina T. MootreyChristine CaseyDavid L. Swerdlow
- Topics
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers)Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (3 papers)Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers)
- Cited by
- EndocrinologyHealthVirology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomPeru
In The Last Decade
Martha H. Roper
12 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Endocrinology 208
- Epidemiology 201
- Health 149
- Infectious Diseases 144
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 113
Countries citing papers authored by Martha H. Roper
This map shows the geographic impact of Martha H. Roper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha H. Roper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha H. Roper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martha H. Roper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha H. Roper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha H. Roper. The network helps show where Martha H. Roper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martha H. Roper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martha H. Roper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martha H. Roper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martha H. Roper. Martha H. Roper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Reliability of the MODS assay decentralisation process in three health regions in Peru. | 11 |
| 6 | Missed opportunities for tuberculosis diagnosis. | 17 |
| 7 | 185 | |
| 8 | MODS accreditation process for regional reference laboratories in Peru: validation by GenoType® MTBDRplus. | 9 |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 207 | |
| 12 | 42 |
About Martha H. Roper
Martha H. Roper is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 595 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (5 papers), Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (3 papers) and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (208 citations), Health (149 citations) and Virology (59 citations). Martha H. Roper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Jos Vandelaer, François Gasse, Joy E Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Simon Cousens, Gina T. Mootrey, Christine Casey, David L. Swerdlow, Louisa E. Chapman and David Moore. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Clinical Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.