Marloes Bults
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Co-authors
- D. BeaujeanHélène VoetenJan Hendrik RichardusJim van SteenbergenGerjo KokPepijn van EmpelenOnno de ZwartMarjolein E.M. den Ouden
- Topics
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers)Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers)Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Marloes Bults
13 papers receiving 509 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Sociology and Political Science 143
- Health 126
- Economics and Econometrics 87
- Modeling and Simulation 84
Countries citing papers authored by Marloes Bults
This map shows the geographic impact of Marloes Bults's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marloes Bults with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marloes Bults more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marloes Bults
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marloes Bults. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marloes Bults. The network helps show where Marloes Bults may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marloes Bults
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marloes Bults. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marloes Bults based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marloes Bults. Marloes Bults is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveysbreakdown → | 379 |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | [Mexican flu: risk perception in the general public, precautionary measures and trust in information provided by the government]. | 11 |
| 12 | [Mexican flu: public reaction to news coverage measured using an internet panel]. | 1 |
| 13 | 4 |
About Marloes Bults
Marloes Bults is a scholar working on Parasitology, Health and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (5 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (84 citations), Health (126 citations) and Applied Psychology (71 citations). Marloes Bults has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include D. Beaujean, Hélène Voeten, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Jim van Steenbergen, Gerjo Kok, Pepijn van Empelen, Onno de Zwart, Marjolein E.M. den Ouden, Clementine Wijkmans and Lili Liu. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Vaccine and Frontiers in Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.