Markus von Ins

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 879 citations indexed

About

Markus von Ins is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Markus von Ins has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 879 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 1 paper in General Health Professions and 1 paper in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Markus von Ins's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Markus von Ins is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Markus von Ins collaborates with scholars based in Denmark and Switzerland. Markus von Ins's co-authors include Peder Olesen Larsen, Stefan Hornbostel, Yuan Sun and Palle Larsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientometrics, Research Evaluation and Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management.

In The Last Decade

Markus von Ins

10 papers receiving 804 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index

2010 615 citations Peder Olesen Larsen, Markus von Ins Scientometrics profile →

Peers

Markus von Ins

SPU

IS

ISM

EE

AI

Elena Corera‐Álvarez Spain

Jacqueline Leta Brazil

Fernanda Morillo Spain

Pierre Deville Belgium

Iman Tahamtan United States

Ali Gazni Iran

Gali Halevi United States

Renger E. de Bruin Netherlands

Subbiah Arunachalam India

Fereshteh Didegah Iran

Elena Corera‐Álvarez Spain

Markus von Ins

290 ×0.8

SPU

161 ×1.1

IS

62 ×0.7

ISM

58 ×0.6

EE

61 ×0.7

AI

Citations per year, relative to Markus von Ins Markus von Ins (= 1×) peers Elena Corera‐Álvarez

Countries citing papers authored by Markus von Ins

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Markus von Ins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus von Ins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus von Ins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Markus von Ins

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus von Ins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus von Ins. The network helps show where Markus von Ins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus von Ins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus von Ins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus von Ins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Markus von Ins. Markus von Ins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Ins, Markus von, et al.. (2011). Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics?. Research Evaluation. 20(1). 31–46. 21 indexed citations

2.

Larsen, Peder Olesen & Markus von Ins. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 84(3). 575–603. 615 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Ins, Markus von, et al.. (2009). Different — not just by label: research-oriented academic careers in Germany. Research Evaluation. 18(3). 177–184. 15 indexed citations

4.

Larsen, Peder Olesen, et al.. (2008). COLLNET JOURNAL OF SCIENTOMETRIC S AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT. 12 indexed citations

5.

Larsen, Peder Olesen, et al.. (2008). Comparisons of results of publication counting using different methods. Scientometrics. 77(1). 147–176. 78 indexed citations

6.

Larsen, Peder Olesen, et al.. (2008). Scientific Output and Impact: Relative Positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management. 2(2). 1–10. 16 indexed citations

7.

Larsen, Palle & Markus von Ins. (2008). Lotka' s Law, Co-authorship and Interdisciplinary Publishing. E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II). 4 indexed citations

8.

Hornbostel, Stefan, et al.. (2008). Funding of young scientist and scientific excellence. Scientometrics. 79(1). 171–190. 41 indexed citations

9.

Larsen, Peder Olesen, et al.. (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics. 73(2). 175–214. 75 indexed citations

10.

Ins, Markus von, et al.. (2001). Bias, structure and quality in citation indexing. Scientometrics. 50(2). 289–299. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact