Marko Nardini

4.1k total citations
110 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Marko Nardini is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Marko Nardini has authored 110 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 31 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 15 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Marko Nardini's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (33 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (26 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (17 papers). Marko Nardini is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (33 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (26 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (17 papers). Marko Nardini collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Marko Nardini's co-authors include Oliver Braddick, Janette Atkinson, Rachael Bedford, Pete R. Jones, Denis Mareschal, Neil Burgess, Shirley Anker, Gary S. Rubin, Karin Petrini and James Negen and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Marko Nardini

105 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marko Nardini United Kingdom 28 1.1k 610 473 425 384 110 2.3k
Daniel D. Dilks United States 27 2.0k 1.7× 396 0.6× 148 0.3× 171 0.4× 130 0.3× 64 2.5k
John Wattam-Bell United Kingdom 28 2.4k 2.1× 211 0.3× 174 0.4× 500 1.2× 538 1.4× 85 3.2k
Mark E. McCourt United States 30 3.2k 2.9× 337 0.6× 263 0.6× 99 0.2× 121 0.3× 99 3.8k
Sabrina Pitzalis Italy 34 4.3k 3.8× 549 0.9× 53 0.1× 198 0.5× 164 0.4× 82 4.8k
Charles J. Duffy United States 23 1.6k 1.4× 189 0.3× 273 0.6× 34 0.1× 149 0.4× 51 2.2k
Deborah Giaschi Canada 30 2.0k 1.8× 127 0.2× 56 0.1× 310 0.7× 981 2.6× 95 2.3k
Keith D. White United States 27 1.6k 1.4× 225 0.4× 39 0.1× 189 0.4× 153 0.4× 79 2.3k
Galia Avidan Israel 33 5.1k 4.5× 1.4k 2.2× 59 0.1× 346 0.8× 128 0.3× 98 5.6k
Scott D. Slotnick United States 31 3.4k 3.0× 569 0.9× 73 0.2× 335 0.8× 61 0.2× 101 3.8k
Robert Fendrich United States 27 1.9k 1.7× 784 1.3× 27 0.1× 110 0.3× 123 0.3× 55 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Marko Nardini

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marko Nardini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marko Nardini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marko Nardini more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marko Nardini

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marko Nardini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marko Nardini. The network helps show where Marko Nardini may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marko Nardini

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marko Nardini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marko Nardini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marko Nardini. Marko Nardini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Negen, James, et al.. (2023). Sensory augmentation for a rapid motor task in a multisensory environment. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 42(2). 113–120.
2.
Nardini, Marko, et al.. (2023). Correctly establishing evidence for cue combination via gains in sensory precision: Why the choice of comparator matters. Behavior Research Methods. 56(4). 2842–2858. 5 indexed citations
3.
Jones, Pete R., et al.. (2015). Automated static threshold perimetry using a remote eye tracker. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 3908–3908. 1 indexed citations
4.
Petrini, Karin, et al.. (2014). The visual influence on path reproduction in darkness is stronger during childhood. Journal of Vision. 14(10). 1345–1345. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Pete R., et al.. (2014). An automated test of infant visual acuity using remote eye-tracking. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 2737–2737. 1 indexed citations
6.
Petrini, Karin, et al.. (2014). Assessing improvements in perception afforded by retinal prostheses in multisensory tasks. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5962–5962. 1 indexed citations
7.
Ripamonti, Caterina, et al.. (2014). A Universal Colour Discrimination Test suitable for observers with low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 3536–3536. 3 indexed citations
8.
Petrini, Karin, et al.. (2014). When vision is not an option: children's integration of auditory and haptic information is suboptimal. Developmental Science. 17(3). 376–387. 50 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Pete R., et al.. (2014). Automated Measurement of Resolution Acuity in Infants Using Remote Eye-Tracking. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(12). 8102–8110. 42 indexed citations
10.
Wattam-Bell, John, Koji Nishiguchi, Vanita Sundaram, et al.. (2013). Cortical visual processing in patients with congenital achromatopsia: coherent form, motion and biological motion perception. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 21–21. 1 indexed citations
11.
Ripamonti, Caterina, et al.. (2013). A novel colour discrimination test suitable for low vision observers. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 1023–1023. 1 indexed citations
12.
Sundaram, Venki, Jonathan Aboshiha, Jill A. Cowing, et al.. (2013). Retinal Structure and Function in Achromatopsia. Ophthalmology. 121(1). 234–245. 126 indexed citations
13.
Nardini, Marko, et al.. (2010). Fusion of disparity and texture cues to slant is not mandatory in children. Journal of Vision. 10(7). 494–494. 4 indexed citations
14.
Nardini, Marko, Pete R. Jones, Rachael Bedford, & Oliver Braddick. (2008). Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation. Current Biology. 18(9). 689–693. 310 indexed citations
15.
Nardini, Marko, et al.. (2006). Young children's errors combining visual information for recognition and action. Perception. 35. 0–0. 1 indexed citations
16.
Atkinson, Janette, Oliver Braddick, Marko Nardini, et al.. (2006). 'Dorsal vulnerability' and patterns of visuo-cognitive deficit following very premature birth. Perception. 35. 3–3. 2 indexed citations
17.
Anker, Shirley, Janette Atkinson, Oliver Braddick, Marko Nardini, & Kelly Richards. (2002). Does videorefractive screening in infancy reduce prevalence of school-age vision problems?. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 2867–2867. 1 indexed citations
18.
Atkinson, Janette, et al.. (2000). Do hyperopia and poor accommodation predict deficits in later cognitive and neurological development of normal infants. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 41(4). 32715. 1 indexed citations
19.
Nardini, Marko, Gabriele Rossi, Antonio Martini, et al.. (1983). Italian Study of Cerebral Reversible Ischemic Attacks. European Neurology. 22(1). 83–88. 1 indexed citations
20.
Fieschi, C., et al.. (1983). Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the province of Siena: Two cases transmitted to monkeys. Neurological Sciences. 4(1). 61–64. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026