Mark Wu

509 total citations
21 papers, 171 citations indexed

About

Mark Wu is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Wu has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 171 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 12 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 7 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mark Wu's work include World Trade Organization Law (18 papers), Global trade and economics (12 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (4 papers). Mark Wu is often cited by papers focused on World Trade Organization Law (18 papers), Global trade and economics (12 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (4 papers). Mark Wu collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Mark Wu's co-authors include James Salzman, Michael Moore, Chad P. Bown, Kamal Saggi, Petros C. Mavroidis, George A. Bermann, Umar Farooq, Lin Li, Emily J. Blanchard and Gregory Shaffer and has published in prestigious journals such as World Trade Review, Harvard international law journal and Northwestern University law review.

In The Last Decade

Mark Wu

18 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Wu United States	7	98	83	62	42	17	21	171
Evgeny Postnikov Australia	8	158 1.6×	100 1.2×	124 2.0×	45 1.1×	67 3.9×	18	247
Mitsuo Matsushita Japan	6	103 1.1×	64 0.8×	72 1.2×	31 0.7×	14 0.8×	38	164
Przemysław Kowalski France	6	38 0.4×	160 1.9×	161 2.6×	115 2.7×	18 1.1×	20	286
Christian Tietje South Korea	7	102 1.0×	16 0.2×	79 1.3×	24 0.6×	10 0.6×	41	175
Andrea Conte Germany	9	57 0.6×	53 0.6×	46 0.7×	209 5.0×	4 0.2×	20	252
Victor Ferguson Australia	7	112 1.1×	48 0.6×	54 0.9×	62 1.5×	34 2.0×	20	219
Andreas Maurer Germany	10	239 2.4×	50 0.6×	133 2.1×	38 0.9×	15 0.9×	48	335
General Agreement on Tariffs	9	48 0.5×	123 1.5×	55 0.9×	70 1.7×	25 1.5×	37	211
Lisa E. Sachs United States	8	45 0.5×	23 0.3×	115 1.9×	39 0.9×	21 1.2×	34	181
William J. Davey United States	9	184 1.9×	115 1.4×	130 2.1×	26 0.6×	25 1.5×	39	235

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wu. The network helps show where Mark Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Wu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Wu. Mark Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Blanchard, Emily J. & Mark Wu. (2019). Externalities and Agricultural Import Bans: Evaluating Regionalization Measures in Light of the Russia–Pigs Dispute. World Trade Review. 18(2). 173–195. 1 indexed citations

Shaffer, Gregory, et al.. (2017). Changing Dynamics in Global Trade Negotiations. 1 indexed citations

Saggi, Kamal & Mark Wu. (2017). Trade and Agricultural Disease: Import Restrictions in the Wake of the India–Agricultural Products Dispute. World Trade Review. 16(2). 279–302. 1 indexed citations

Wu, Mark. (2017). China's Export Restrictions and the Limits of WTO Law. World Trade Review. 16(4). 673–691. 7 indexed citations

Wu, Mark. (2016). The 'China, Inc.' Challenge to Global Trade Governance. Harvard international law journal. 57(2). 261–324. 55 indexed citations

Saggi, Kamal & Mark Wu. (2016). Trade and Agricultural Disease: Import Restrictions in the Wake of the India Agricultural Products Dispute. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Saggi, Kamal & Mark Wu. (2016). Understanding Agricultural Price Range Systems as Trade Restraints: Peru–Agricultural Products. World Trade Review. 15(2). 259–286. 2 indexed citations

Wu, Mark. (2015). Rethinking the Temporary Breach Puzzle: A Window on the Future of International Trade Conflicts. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 40(1). 4. 1 indexed citations

Moore, Michael & Mark Wu. (2015). Antidumping and Strategic Industrial Policy: Tit-for-Tat Trade Remedies and theChina–X-Ray EquipmentDispute. World Trade Review. 14(2). 239–286. 10 indexed citations

10.

Moore, Michael & Mark Wu. (2015). Antidumping and Strategic Industrial Policy: Tit-for-Tat Trade Remedies and the China-X-Ray Equipment Dispute. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

11.

Bown, Chad P. & Mark Wu. (2014). Safeguards and the perils of preferential trade agreements:Dominican Republic–Safeguard Measures. World Trade Review. 13(2). 179–227. 6 indexed citations

12.

Wu, Mark & James Salzman. (2014). THE NEXT GENERATION OF TRADE AND ENVIRONMENT CONFLICTS: THE RISE OF GREEN INDUSTRIAL POLICY. Northwestern University law review. 108(2). 401–474. 35 indexed citations

13.

Wu, Mark. (2014). Why Developing Countries Won't Negotiate: The Case of the WTO Environmental Goods Agreement. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 6(1). 93–176. 7 indexed citations

14.

Saggi, Kamal & Mark Wu. (2013). Yet Another Nail in the Coffin of Zeroing: United States – Anti-Dumping Administrative Reviews and Other Measures Related to Imports of Certain Orange Juice from Brazil. World Trade Review. 12(2). 377–408. 3 indexed citations

15.

Wu, Mark. (2012). Antidumping in Asia's Emerging Giants. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 14 indexed citations

16.

Mavroidis, Petros C., George A. Bermann, & Mark Wu. (2010). The Law of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Documents, Cases and Analysis. eYLS (Yale Law School). 5 indexed citations

17.

Mavroidis, Petros C., George A. Bermann, & Mark Wu. (2010). The Law of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Supplemental Addendum on the Trips Agreement and the Domestic Legal Orders of Emerging Economies. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

18.

Wu, Mark. (2008). Free Trade and the Protection of Public Morals: An Analysis of the Newly Emerging Public Morals Clause Doctrine. The Yale journal of international law. 33(1). 6. 16 indexed citations

19.

Wu, Mark. (2008). Free Trade and the Protection of Public Morals. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).

20.

Wu, Mark, et al.. (2006). Setting research and development priorities for market-oriented vegetable production systems in Central Asia and the Caucasus. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact