Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Bennett
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Bennett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Bennett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Bennett more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Bennett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Bennett. The network helps show where Mark W. Bennett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark W. Bennett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark W. Bennett.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark W. Bennett based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark W. Bennett. Mark W. Bennett is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Levinson, Justin D., et al.. (2017). Judging Implicit Bias: A National Empirical Study of Judicial Stereotypes. Florida law review. 69(1). 63.17 indexed citations
3.
Bennett, Mark W. & Victoria C. Plaut. (2017). Looking Criminal and the Presumption of Dangerousness: Afrocentric Facial Features, Skin Tone, and Criminal Justice. SSRN Electronic Journal. 51. 745.5 indexed citations
Bennett, Mark W.. (2015). A Slow Motion Lynching? The War on Drugs, Mass Incarceration, Doing Kimbrough Justice, and a Response to Two Third Circuit Judges. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Bennett, Mark W.. (2015). Unspringing the Witness Memory and Demeanor Trap: What Every Judge and Juror Needs to Know About Cognitive Psychology and Witness Credibility. The American University law review. 64(6). 1331.3 indexed citations
7.
Bennett, Mark W. & Ira P. Robbins. (2014). Last Words: A Survey and Analysis of Federal Judges' Views on Allocution in Sentencing. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Bennett, Mark W.. (2014). Eight Traits of Great Trial Lawyers: A Federal Judge's View on How to Shed the Moniker "I Am a Litigator". SSRN Electronic Journal. 33(1). 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Bennett, Mark W., et al.. (2014). A "Holocaust in Slow Motion?": America's Mass Incarceration and the Role of Discretion. The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University). 7(2). 117.1 indexed citations
10.
Bennett, Mark W.. (2014). Confronting Cognitive 'Anchoring Effect' and 'Blind Spot' Biases in Federal Sentencing: A Modest Solution for Reforming a Fundamental Flaw. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 104(3). 489–534.17 indexed citations
11.
Kang, Jerry, Mark W. Bennett, Devon W. Carbado, et al.. (2012). Implicit Bias in the Courtroom. eYLS (Yale Law School). 59(5). 1124–1186.91 indexed citations
12.
Bennett, Mark W.. (2010). Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problem of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions. SSRN Electronic Journal.13 indexed citations
13.
Bennett, Mark W., et al.. (2005). Judges' Views on Vanishing Civil Trials. 88(6). 306.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.