Mark V. Smith

469 total citations
10 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Mark V. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark V. Smith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark V. Smith's work include Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Mark V. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Mark V. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark V. Smith's co-authors include Gerard S. Rodziewicz, Charles J. Hodge, Edward R. Laws, Robert M. Kellman, Richard T. Kelley, A. Vania Apkarian, Lloyd Guth, Charles P. Barrett, Edward J. Donati and Freedolph D. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Mark V. Smith

10 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark V. Smith United States	9	155	153	144	67	57	10	363
Ales F. Aliashkevich Germany	11	18 0.1×	134 0.9×	107 0.7×	50 0.7×	74 1.3×	15	431
Fang Liang China	13	129 0.8×	26 0.2×	60 0.4×	52 0.8×	163 2.9×	33	423
Masami Ono Japan	12	526 3.4×	64 0.4×	185 1.3×	97 1.4×	12 0.2×	24	684
Antonio Ruelle Italy	15	39 0.3×	211 1.4×	111 0.8×	77 1.1×	58 1.0×	21	469
David Cunnah United Kingdom	11	310 2.0×	62 0.4×	129 0.9×	23 0.3×	6 0.1×	12	522
William A. Seiler United States	9	32 0.2×	222 1.5×	223 1.5×	10 0.1×	62 1.1×	13	450
Nebras M. Warsi Canada	12	44 0.3×	90 0.6×	25 0.2×	14 0.2×	43 0.8×	28	348
B Hemmer United States	9	45 0.3×	50 0.3×	35 0.2×	33 0.5×	37 0.6×	18	371
Xinguang Yu China	12	48 0.3×	62 0.4×	56 0.4×	91 1.4×	35 0.6×	29	413
J Bèrciano Spain	11	18 0.1×	134 0.9×	70 0.5×	12 0.2×	23 0.4×	25	357

Countries citing papers authored by Mark V. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark V. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark V. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark V. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark V. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark V. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark V. Smith. The network helps show where Mark V. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark V. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark V. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark V. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark V. Smith. Mark V. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Rodziewicz, Gerard S., Mark V. Smith, & Charles J. Hodge. (2000). Endoscopic Colloid Cyst Surgery. Neurosurgery. 46(3). 655–662. 71 indexed citations

2.

Caruso, Riccardo, et al.. (1998). Giant cervical epidural veins after craniectomy for head trauma.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 19(5). 903–6. 11 indexed citations

3.

Rodziewicz, Gerard S., Richard T. Kelley, Robert M. Kellman, & Mark V. Smith. (1996). Transnasal Endoscopic Surgery of the Pituitary Gland: Technical Note. Neurosurgery. 39(1). 189–193. 91 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Mark V. & Edward R. Laws. (1994). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Pituitary Stalk Compression and Deviation in Patients with Nonprolactin-Secreting Intrasellar and Parasellar Tumors. Neurosurgery. 34(5). 834–839. 49 indexed citations

5.

Smith, Mark V. & Edward R. Laws. (1994). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements of Pituitary Stalk Compression and Deviation in Patients with Nonprolactin-Secreting Intrasellar and Parasellar Tumors. Neurosurgery. 34(5). 834–839. 5 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Mark V. & Charles J. Hodge. (1992). Response Properties of Upper Cervical Spinothalamic Neurons in Cats. Spine. 17(Supplement). S375–S382. 8 indexed citations

7.

Smith, Mark V. & A. Vania Apkarian. (1991). Thalamically projecting cells of the lateral cervical nucleus in monkey. Brain Research. 555(1). 10–18. 8 indexed citations

8.

Smith, Mark V., A. Vania Apkarian, & Charles J. Hodge. (1991). Somatosensory response properties of contralaterally projecting spinothalamic and nonspinothalamic neurons in the second cervical segment of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology. 66(1). 83–102. 39 indexed citations

9.

Guth, Lloyd, et al.. (1985). Essentiality of a specific cellular terrain for growth of axons into a spinal cord lesion. Experimental Neurology. 88(1). 1–12. 61 indexed citations

10.

Guth, Lloyd, et al.. (1985). Enhancement of axonal growth into a spinal lesion by topical application of triethanolamine and cytosine arabinoside. Experimental Neurology. 88(1). 44–55. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact