Mark Trodden

14.1k total citations · 5 hit papers
139 papers, 9.4k citations indexed

About

Mark Trodden is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Trodden has authored 139 papers receiving a total of 9.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 129 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 125 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 16 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Mark Trodden's work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (126 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (101 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (37 papers). Mark Trodden is often cited by papers focused on Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (126 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (101 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (37 papers). Mark Trodden collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Mark Trodden's co-authors include Sean M. Carroll, Michael S. Turner, Kurt Hinterbichler, Mark B. Hoffman, Justin Khoury, Austin Joyce, Bhuvnesh Jain, Alessandra Silvestri, Antonio Riotto and Antonio De Felice and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Reviews of Modern Physics and Physics Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mark Trodden

132 papers receiving 9.2k citations

Hit Papers

Is cosmic speed-up due to new gravitational physics? 2003 2026 2010 2018 2004 2003 2014 2005 2020 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Trodden United States 44 8.5k 7.9k 1.0k 632 384 139 9.4k
Misao Sasaki Japan 56 11.4k 1.3× 8.1k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 997 1.6× 699 1.8× 272 11.8k
Edward W. Kolb United States 57 10.6k 1.2× 11.1k 1.4× 983 0.9× 534 0.8× 910 2.4× 195 13.0k
Antonio Riotto Switzerland 69 14.0k 1.6× 12.9k 1.6× 929 0.9× 972 1.5× 506 1.3× 292 16.6k
Alberto Nicolis United States 30 5.0k 0.6× 4.5k 0.6× 986 0.9× 318 0.5× 508 1.3× 55 5.6k
Edmund J. Copeland United Kingdom 50 13.0k 1.5× 10.9k 1.4× 1.5k 1.4× 859 1.4× 651 1.7× 183 13.7k
David H. Lyth United Kingdom 46 10.6k 1.2× 9.0k 1.1× 779 0.7× 1.0k 1.6× 341 0.9× 137 11.3k
I. Tkachev Russia 42 5.1k 0.6× 5.3k 0.7× 666 0.6× 238 0.4× 881 2.3× 135 6.5k
Justin Khoury United States 43 9.1k 1.1× 7.3k 0.9× 1.2k 1.2× 650 1.0× 983 2.6× 106 9.8k
Rong-Gen Cai China 53 8.5k 1.0× 7.6k 1.0× 2.7k 2.6× 276 0.4× 835 2.2× 155 8.9k
Robert Brandenberger Canada 59 11.6k 1.4× 10.3k 1.3× 2.5k 2.4× 508 0.8× 1.1k 2.9× 322 12.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Trodden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Trodden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Trodden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Trodden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Trodden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Trodden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Trodden. The network helps show where Mark Trodden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Trodden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Trodden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Trodden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Trodden. Mark Trodden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jaraba, Santiago, et al.. (2025). First astrometric constraints on parity-violation in the gravitational wave background. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2025(8). 57–57.
2.
Khoury, Justin, Mengxiang Lin, & Mark Trodden. (2025). Apparent w<-1 and a Lower S_{8} from Dark Axion and Dark Baryons Interactions.. PubMed. 135(18). 181001–181001. 9 indexed citations
3.
Luca, Valerio De, et al.. (2025). Tidal Love numbers of analog black holes. Physical review. D. 111(4). 4 indexed citations
4.
Giblin, John T., et al.. (2024). Simulating a numerical UV completion of quartic Galileons. Physical review. D. 109(12). 1 indexed citations
5.
Hu, Wayne, et al.. (2024). Testing gravity with realistic gravitational waveforms in Pulsar Timing Arrays. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024(12). 54–54. 1 indexed citations
6.
Luca, Valerio De, et al.. (2024). Tidal Love numbers and Green’s functions in black hole spacetimes. Physical review. D. 110(6). 14 indexed citations
7.
Karwal, Tanvi, Marco Raveri, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury, & Mark Trodden. (2022). Chameleon early dark energy and the Hubble tension. CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa). 90 indexed citations
8.
Trodden, Mark, et al.. (2021). Detecting the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Massive Gravity with Pulsar Timing Arrays. arXiv (Cornell University). 31 indexed citations
9.
González, Mariana Carrillo, et al.. (2021). Effective field theory for binary cosmic strings. Physical review. D. 104(4). 1 indexed citations
10.
Sakstein, Jeremy & Mark Trodden. (2020). Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension. Physical Review Letters. 124(16). 161301–161301. 185 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
González, Mariana Carrillo, et al.. (2020). Holographic two-point functions in the pseudoconformal universe. Physical review. D. 102(12). 2 indexed citations
12.
Koehn, Michael & Mark Trodden. (2016). Supersymmetric k-defects. Physics Letters B. 755. 498–503. 7 indexed citations
13.
Goon, Garrett, et al.. (2013). Massive Gravity Coupled to Galileons is Ghost-Free. Physical Review Letters. 111(6). 61107–61107. 29 indexed citations
14.
Feng, Jonathan L. & Mark Trodden. (2010). Dark worlds. (Cover story). Scientific American. 303(5). 38–45.
15.
Silvestri, Alessandra & Mark Trodden. (2009). Non-Gaussian Signatures from the Postinflationary Early Universe. Physical Review Letters. 103(25). 251301–251301. 5 indexed citations
16.
Toharia, Manuel & Mark Trodden. (2008). Metastable Kinks in the Orbifold. Physical Review Letters. 100(4). 41602–41602. 13 indexed citations
17.
Bean, Rachel, et al.. (2007). Dynamics of linear perturbations inf(R)gravity. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 75(6). 218 indexed citations
18.
Melchiorri, A., Laura Mersini–Houghton, Carolina J. Ödman, & Mark Trodden. (2003). The state of the dark energy equation of state. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(4). 294 indexed citations
19.
Starkman, Glenn D., Dejan Stojković, & Mark Trodden. (2001). Homogeneity, Flatness, and “Large” Extra Dimensions. Physical Review Letters. 87(23). 231303–231303. 75 indexed citations
20.
Vachaspati, Tanmay & Mark Trodden. (1999). Causality and cosmic inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 61(2). 84 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026