Mark Sterling

4.2k citations
116 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 32

Mark Sterling

113 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Mark Sterling
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Environmental Engineering 1.3k
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.1k
  • Computational Mechanics 857
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 422
  • Earth-Surface Processes 167
Replace Xiaolei Yang with:
Xiaolei Yang China
R.P. Hoxey United Kingdom
Thomas K. Flesch Canada
Charlotte Bay Hasager Denmark
Jingwei Wu China
Katherine Klink United States
K. M. Lam Hong Kong
Dirk Schindler Germany
J.J. Colls United Kingdom
Chia‐Ren Chu Taiwan
Mark Sterling relative to Xiaolei Yang China Xiaolei Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Xiaolei Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sterling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sterling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sterling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sterling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sterling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sterling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sterling. The network helps show where Mark Sterling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sterling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sterling Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sterling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20241
3 20242
4 20232
5 20239
6 20223
7 202010
8 202049
9 202010
10 201912
11 20197
12 201888
13 201810
14 201822
15 201533
16 201436
17
An investigation of the aerodynamic admittances and weighting functions of trains
20082
18 20081
19 200731
20
Comparison of Colebrook-White and Hazen-Williams flow models in real-time water network simulation
19881

About Mark Sterling

Mark Sterling is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 116 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wind and Air Flow Studies (46 papers), Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research (31 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (23 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis (20 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (19 papers), Hydraulic flow and structures (16 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (15 papers) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (1.3k citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.1k citations) and Computational Mechanics (857 citations). Mark Sterling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chris Baker, P.M. Berry, Donald W. Knight, Andrew Quinn, Hassan Hemida, Mike Jesson, David Soper, John Spink, John Bridgeman and Stanley C. Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Wind and Structures, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit and Journal of Hydroinformatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026