Mark Spivak
Impact in
- Developmental Biology top 5%
- Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
- Genetics 15
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 15
-
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 10
- Primate Behavior and Ecology 4
- Co-authors
- Gregory S. Berns (19 shared papers)Andrew M. Brooks (7 shared papers)Peter F. Cook (8 shared papers)Ashley Prichard (8 shared papers)Daniel D. Dilks (1 shared paper)Kerinne Levy (1 shared paper)Stella F. Lourenco (1 shared paper)Sarah Nemanic (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (2 papers)Animal Cognition (2 papers)PeerJ (2 papers)Journal of Veterinary Behavior (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Spivak
20 papers receiving 621 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Developmental Biology 53
- Sensory Systems 109
- Genetics 459
- Pharmacy 72
- Small Animals 113
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Spivak
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Spivak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Spivak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Spivak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Spivak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Spivak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Spivak. The network helps show where Mark Spivak may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark Spivak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 130 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1957 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 |
About Mark Spivak
Mark Spivak is a scholar working on Genetics, Social Psychology, Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Small Animals, having authored 20 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (15 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Infant Health and Development (2 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (53 citations), Sensory Systems (109 citations), Genetics (459 citations), Pharmacy (72 citations) and Small Animals (113 citations). Mark Spivak has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gregory S. Berns, Andrew M. Brooks, Peter F. Cook, Ashley Prichard, Daniel D. Dilks, Kerinne Levy, Stella F. Lourenco, Sarah Nemanic and Nicole C. Northrup. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Animal Cognition, PeerJ, Journal of Veterinary Behavior and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.