Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Smith. The network helps show where Mark Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Smith. Mark Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Mark, et al.. (2014). Perceptions and Understanding of Games Creation: Teacher Candidates Perspective.. The Physical Educator. 71(1).1 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Mark. (2011). How Christian Groups in America Have Accommodated Changing Beliefs about Homosexuality. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Mark. (2009). Democratization of the Afterlife. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1(1).7 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Mark, et al.. (2009). Secondary Students' Perceptions of Enjoyment in Physical Education: An American and English Perspective. The Physical Educator. 66(4). 209–221.36 indexed citations
Smith, Mark, et al.. (2007). Middle School Students' Perceptions of Active Homework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 78(1).1 indexed citations
13.
Taylor, Stephen & Mark Smith. (2004). Evangelicalism in the Church of England c.1790-c.1890: a miscellany.1 indexed citations
14.
Forehand, Mark, John Gastil, & Mark Smith. (2004). Endorsements as Voting Cues: Heuristic and Systematic Processing in Initiative Elections.. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Mark. (2001). Politicians in the pulpit: Christian radicalism in Britain from the fall of the Bastille to the disintegration of Chartism. Journal of Religious History. 25(2). 226–227.2 indexed citations
Smith, Mark. (1996). Andrew Brown's "Earnest Endeavor": The Federal Gazette's Role in Philadelphia's Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793. The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography. 120(4). 321–342.3 indexed citations
Smith, Mark, et al.. (1986). Decade-band mixer covers 3.5 to 35 GHz. Microwave journal. 29. 163.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.