Mark Singleton
Impact in
-
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Religious studies top 2%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Judith Rosen (3 shared papers)D M Fisher (2 shared papers)Dennis M. Fisher (1 shared paper)Tyler M. Muffly (4 shared papers)Anita Honkanen (5 shared papers)Jean Byrne (1 shared paper)Cedric R. Bainton (1 shared paper)Fred Morady (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (4 papers)Histopathology (2 papers)Anesthesiology (2 papers)Pharmacology (1 paper)British Journal of Anaesthesia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Mark Singleton
24 papers receiving 430 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 103
- Religious studies 49
- Developmental Neuroscience 37
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25
- Emergency Medical Services 31
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Singleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Singleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Singleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Singleton. The network helps show where Mark Singleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yoga Body Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 114 |
| 2 | 1987 | 62 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 59 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 5 | Roots of Yoga | 2017 | 23 |
| 6 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 3 |
About Mark Singleton
Mark Singleton is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Gender Studies, having authored 26 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Abdominal Surgery and Complications (5 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers) and Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (103 citations), Religious studies (49 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (31 citations). Mark Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Judith Rosen, D M Fisher, Dennis M. Fisher, Tyler M. Muffly, Anita Honkanen, Jean Byrne, Cedric R. Bainton, Fred Morady, William Shapiro and Robbie Weterings. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Histopathology, Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and British Journal of Anaesthesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.