Mark Schüttpelz
Impact in
- Structural Biology top 0.2%
- Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Biophysics top 0.05%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Papers in
-
- Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications 6
- Biophysics 18
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 18
- Cell Image Analysis Techniques 6
- Co-authors
- Markus SauerMike HeilemannSebastian van de LindeAnindita MukherjeePhilip TinnefeldRobert KasperBritta SeefeldtThomas Huser
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (2 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)Nanophotonics (2 papers)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Traffic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNorwayUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Schüttpelz
24 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Structural Biology 635
- Biophysics 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 768
- Molecular Biology 832
- Cell Biology 155
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schüttpelz
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schüttpelz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schüttpelz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schüttpelz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schüttpelz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schüttpelz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schüttpelz. The network helps show where Mark Schüttpelz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Schüttpelz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 118 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 65 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 179 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 17 | Subdiffraction‐Resolution Fluorescence Imaging with Conventional Fluorescent Probes Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 1436 |
| 18 | 2008 | 104 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 25 |
About Mark Schüttpelz
Mark Schüttpelz is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (18 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (5 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (2 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (635 citations), Biophysics (1.6k citations), Biomedical Engineering (768 citations), Molecular Biology (832 citations) and Cell Biology (155 citations). Mark Schüttpelz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Markus Sauer, Mike Heilemann, Sebastian van de Linde, Anindita Mukherjee, Philip Tinnefeld, Robert Kasper, Britta Seefeldt, Thomas Huser, Steve Wolter and Robin Diekmann. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Nature Communications, Nanophotonics, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Traffic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.