Mark Ring
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Co-authors
- R.E. Huber (5 shared papers)A.M.J. Buchan (3 shared papers)R. Mark Meloche (2 shared papers)J. Meredith (4 shared papers)Paul E. Squires (1 shared paper)Hugh W. Brock (3 shared papers)David A. Theilmann (3 shared papers)J. E. Phillips (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (4 papers)Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (2 papers)Gastroenterology (2 papers)Biochemistry and Cell Biology (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark Ring
16 papers receiving 453 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 177
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 42
- Insect Science 69
- Biotechnology 48
- Genetics 124
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ring
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ring. The network helps show where Mark Ring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 101 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 86 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 36 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 23 | |
| 10 | Locust ion transport peptide (ITP): function, structure, cDNA and expression. | 1998 | 18 |
| 11 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 1 |
About Mark Ring
Mark Ring is a scholar working on Biophysics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (3 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (2 papers) and Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (177 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (42 citations), Insect Science (69 citations), Biotechnology (48 citations) and Genetics (124 citations). Mark Ring has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R.E. Huber, A.M.J. Buchan, R. Mark Meloche, J. Meredith, Paul E. Squires, Hugh W. Brock, David A. Theilmann, J. E. Phillips, N N Cheng and Tom Pfeifer. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Gastroenterology, Biochemistry and Cell Biology and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.