Mark Nootens
Impact in
-
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management
-
- Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy 4
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management 2
- Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise 1
-
- Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments 7
- Co-authors
- Stuart RichElizabeth KaufmannDianne JuddCynthia ToherThomas S. RectorGary S. FrancisChristopher J. WolfkielEva V. Chomka
- Journals
- The American Journal of Cardiology (4 papers)CHEST Journal (2 papers)Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark Nootens
8 papers receiving 482 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 361
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 455
- Hepatology 43
- Genetics 37
- Internal Medicine 10
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nootens
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nootens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nootens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nootens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nootens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nootens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nootens. The network helps show where Mark Nootens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nootens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 256 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 67 | |
| 4 | Timing of single lung transplantation for primary pulmonary hypertension. | 1994 | 25 |
| 5 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 45 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 1 |
About Mark Nootens
Mark Nootens is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Surgery and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (7 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (1 paper), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (1 paper), Vascular Anomalies and Treatments (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (361 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (455 citations), Hepatology (43 citations), Genetics (37 citations) and Internal Medicine (10 citations). Mark Nootens has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Rich, Elizabeth Kaufmann, Dianne Judd, Cynthia Toher, Thomas S. Rector, Gary S. Francis, Christopher J. Wolfkiel, Eva V. Chomka, Robert E. Vestal and Walker Long. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Cardiology, CHEST Journal, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.