Mark Nicoletti

75 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers

Mark Nicoletti
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.9k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Pharmacology 362
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Clinical Psychology 358
Replace Roberto B. Sassi with:
Roberto B. Sassi Canada
Warrick J. Brewer Australia
Koji Matsuo Japan
Yoshio Hirayasu Japan
Katharina Dohm Germany
Jonathan Repple Germany
Serge M. Sevy United States
Susanne L. Meinert Germany
Richard D. Weiner United States
Joost Janssen Spain
Mark Nicoletti relative to Roberto B. Sassi Canada Roberto B. Sassi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Roberto B. Sassi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nicoletti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nicoletti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nicoletti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nicoletti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nicoletti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nicoletti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nicoletti. The network helps show where Mark Nicoletti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nicoletti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Nicoletti Line = papers co-authored together Mark Nicoletti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007221
2 2008213
3 2002205
4 2010202
5 2003194
6 2003177
7 2004174
8 2004162
9 2004140
10 2004139
11 2006133
12 2007123
13 2001121
14
Corpus callosum signal intensity in patients with bipolar and unipolar disorder.
2004119
15 2005113
16 2003101
17 2001100
18 200399
19 200795
20 200992

About Mark Nicoletti

Mark Nicoletti is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 75 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (57 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (10 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.9k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Pharmacology (362 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (358 citations). Mark Nicoletti has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jair C. Soares, Paolo Brambilla, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Roberto B. Sassi, John P. Hatch, Alan G. Mallinger, Ellen Frank, David J. Kupfer, Sheila C. Caetano and Fabiano Gonçalves Nery. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Psychiatric Research, Bipolar Disorders and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact