Mark Nagel

1.7k citations
66 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Nagel

51 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark Nagel
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 836
  • Pharmaceutical Science 85
  • Virology 58
  • Hematology 114
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 176
Replace M Bachofen with:
M Bachofen Switzerland
John P. Mitchell United States
Max R. Hardeman Netherlands
Kei Matsuoka Japan
Erik N. Sorensen United States
J. Radermacher Germany
Robert Sussman United States
Makoto Arai Japan
Matthew Brown United States
Daniel Katz United States
Mark Nagel relative to M Bachofen Switzerland M Bachofen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.3×
M Bachofen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Nagel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nagel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nagel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nagel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Nagel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nagel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nagel. The network helps show where Mark Nagel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Nagel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Nagel Line = papers co-authored together Mark Nagel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002205
2 2003136
3 1997120
4 200684
5 200379
6 200452
7 200747
8 201943
9 199941
10 199737
11 200736
12 200928
13 200228
14 200625
15 201024
16 200623
17 202223
18 200922
19 199917
20
[Portography by transparietal splenic route].
195117

About Mark Nagel

Mark Nagel is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (47 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (10 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (7 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (6 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (6 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (5 papers) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (836 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (85 citations), Virology (58 citations), Hematology (114 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (176 citations). Mark Nagel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jolyon P. Mitchell, Gieri Camenisch, Daniel Sherman, Hans‐Peter Gerber, M. Teresa Pisabarro, Joe Kowalski, Xiao Liang, Sarah Bodary, Kevin Clark and Maureen H. Beresini. Their work appears in journals such as AAPS PharmSciTech, Respiratory Care, Aerosol Science and Technology, European Respiratory Journal and Blood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact