Mark LeBar

775 total citations
16 papers, 157 citations indexed

About

Mark LeBar is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark LeBar has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 157 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mark LeBar's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). Mark LeBar is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers). Mark LeBar collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Mark LeBar's co-authors include Michael Slote, Mohammed Selman, William Stecho, Md Niaz Rahim, Nicole Forbes, Wanhong Xu, Kevin M. Coombs and Earl G. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of General Virology, Ethics and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Mark LeBar

16 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark LeBar United States	7	83	42	31	29	21	16	157
Luke Gormally United Kingdom	6	79 1.0×	24 0.6×	26 0.8×	24 0.8×	19 0.9×	15	134
Simon Kirchin United Kingdom	6	67 0.8×	43 1.0×	54 1.7×	12 0.4×	23 1.1×	17	154
Matthew C. Altman United States	6	49 0.6×	28 0.7×	13 0.4×	26 0.9×	17 0.8×	25	123
Alison McIntyre United States	7	73 0.9×	72 1.7×	33 1.1×	26 0.9×	35 1.7×	8	167
David Cummiskey United States	6	94 1.1×	69 1.6×	12 0.4×	57 2.0×	17 0.8×	15	141
Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir United States	6	60 0.7×	23 0.5×	10 0.3×	54 1.9×	110 5.2×	14	180
Karen Stohr United States	6	52 0.6×	42 1.0×	17 0.5×	26 0.9×	17 0.8×	15	106
Sharon Farmer United States	9	13 0.2×	6 0.1×	18 0.6×	19 0.7×	36 1.7×	28	251
Nelson Potter United States	6	96 1.2×	56 1.3×	18 0.6×	43 1.5×	17 0.8×	17	147
Richard Yetter Chappell United States	7	112 1.3×	97 2.3×	24 0.8×	41 1.4×	15 0.7×	16	169

Countries citing papers authored by Mark LeBar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark LeBar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark LeBar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark LeBar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark LeBar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark LeBar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark LeBar. The network helps show where Mark LeBar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark LeBar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark LeBar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark LeBar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark LeBar. Mark LeBar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

LeBar, Mark. (2020). Equality of Authority as the Aristotelian Common Good. The Journal of Value Inquiry. 55(3). 399–416. 1 indexed citations

2.

LeBar, Mark. (2017). Eudaimonism. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

3.

LeBar, Mark. (2015). Virtue and Second-Personal Reasons: A Reply to Cokelet. Ethics. 126(1). 162–174. 5 indexed citations

4.

LeBar, Mark. (2013). The Value of Living Well. Oxford University Press eBooks. 14 indexed citations

5.

LeBar, Mark. (2013). The virtue of justice revisited. 1 indexed citations

6.

Rahim, Md Niaz, Mohammed Selman, Nicole Forbes, et al.. (2012). Generation and characterization of a new panel of broadly reactive anti-NS1 mAbs for detection of influenza A virus. Journal of General Virology. 94(3). 593–605. 19 indexed citations

7.

LeBar, Mark. (2009). Virtue Ethics and Deontic Constraints. Ethics. 119(4). 642–671. 19 indexed citations

8.

LeBar, Mark. (2007). ARISTOTELIAN CONSTRUCTIVISM. Social Philosophy and Policy. 25(1). 182–213. 14 indexed citations

9.

LeBar, Mark. (2005). Three Dogmas of Response-Dependence. Philosophical Studies. 123(3). 175–211. 6 indexed citations

10.

LeBar, Mark. (2004). Ends. Social Theory and Practice. 30(4). 507–533. 2 indexed citations

11.

LeBar, Mark. (2004). GOOD FOR YOU. Pacific philosophical quarterly. 85(2). 195–217. 27 indexed citations

12.

LeBar, Mark & Michael Slote. (2002). Justice as a Virtue. 28 indexed citations

13.

LeBar, Mark. (2001). Korsgaard, Wittgenstein, and the Mafioso. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 39(2). 261–271. 6 indexed citations

14.

LeBar, Mark. (2001). Simulation, theory, and emotion. Philosophical Psychology. 14(4). 423–434. 4 indexed citations

15.

LeBar, Mark. (1999). Virtue Ethics and the Interests of Others. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations

16.

LeBar, Mark. (1999). Kant on Welfare. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 29(2). 225–249. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact