Mark Kaplan

2.7k citations
31 papers · 775 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Kaplan

29 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

Mark Kaplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Emergency Medicine 206
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 461
  • Surgery 577
  • Rehabilitation 56
  • Cancer Research 95
Replace I. Dawson with:
I. Dawson Netherlands
Mario Solej Italy
Iain McCallum United Kingdom
Daniele Biacchi Italy
Danny Takanishi United States
Metin Kement Türkiye
J. Hamilton United Kingdom
U. Lehmann Germany
Simone Sibio Italy
Peter A. Neijenhuis Netherlands
Mark Kaplan relative to I. Dawson Netherlands I. Dawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
I. Dawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Kaplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Kaplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Kaplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Kaplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Kaplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Kaplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Kaplan. The network helps show where Mark Kaplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Kaplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Kaplan Line = papers co-authored together Mark Kaplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992120
2 2009115
3 2013115
4
Management of the open abdomen: from initial operation to definitive closure.
200995
5 202056
6 200948
7 201646
8 199839
9
Managing the open abdomen.
200428
10
Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of abdominal compartment syndrome.
200420
11 201518
12
Palpable abnormalities of the breast not requiring excisional biopsy.
199217
13 20219
14 20199
15 19869
16 20207
17 20177
18 20234
19 20172
20 20142

About Mark Kaplan

Mark Kaplan is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Abdominal Surgery and Complications (8 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (7 papers), Pneumothorax, Barotrauma, Emphysema (6 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (4 papers), Hernia repair and management (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (206 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (461 citations), Surgery (577 citations), Rehabilitation (56 citations) and Cancer Research (95 citations). Mark Kaplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Robert G. Somers, Michael L. Cheatham, Lisa Jablon, Timothy C. Fabian, Martin Björck, Stephen Stemkowski, Thomas Wild, A. Bruhin, Alastair Windsor and Grant V. Bochicchio. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, Critical Care Medicine, World Journal of Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons and Injury.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact