Mark Jones

1.8k citations
84 papers · 883 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Jones

80 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

Mark Jones
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Molecular Medicine 93
  • Endocrinology 49
  • Bioengineering 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 95
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 70
Replace Michiel Stock with:
Michiel Stock Belgium
Sagi Snir Israel
Chengxi Ye China
István Miklós Hungary
Andrew Francis Australia
Chaochao Yan China
Eric D. Kelsic United States
Soichiro Tsuda Japan
Bastian Pfeifer Austria
Ferran Silva Spain
Mark Jones relative to Michiel Stock Belgium Michiel Stock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Michiel Stock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jones. The network helps show where Mark Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Jones Line = papers co-authored together Mark Jones links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 20231
3 202211
4 20217
5 201912
6 20191
7 201712
8 20161
9 201612
10 20163
11 20165
12 20136
13 20131
14 20138
15 20115
16 200890
17 200736
18
Optical fiber extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometric (EFPI)-based biosensors
20004
19
Long-Period Gratings as Flow Sensors for Liquid-Composite Molding
20001
20
Optical fiber-based chemical sensors for detection of corrosion precursors and by-products
19997

About Mark Jones

Mark Jones is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and General Decision Sciences, having authored 84 papers that have together received 883 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (20 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (19 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (14 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (13 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (11 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (9 papers) and Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (93 citations), Endocrinology (49 citations), Bioengineering (52 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (95 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (70 citations). Mark Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul H. Barber, Gregory Gutin, Jonathan A. Greene, Richard O. Claus, Leo van Iersel, Kent A. Murphy, J. Verhoef, Vikram Bhatia, Ad C. Fluit and Tuan Anh Tran. Their work appears in journals such as Algorithmica, Theoretical Computer Science, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Journal of Computer and System Sciences and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026