Mark Jermy

1.9k citations
114 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Jermy

109 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Mark Jermy
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Computational Mechanics 429
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 12
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 78
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 77
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 311
Replace Andrzej Przekwas with:
Andrzej Przekwas United States
Lyle F. Mockros United States
Pin Tong Hong Kong
Tracie Barber Australia
Ch. Brücker Germany
Andreas Almqvist Sweden
Bharat K. Soni United States
António F. Miguel Portugal
Christian Geindreau France
Luoding Zhu United States
Mark Jermy relative to Andrzej Przekwas United States Andrzej Przekwas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Andrzej Przekwas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Jermy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jermy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jermy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jermy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Jermy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jermy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jermy. The network helps show where Mark Jermy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Jermy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Jermy Line = papers co-authored together Mark Jermy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201273
2 200069
3 201565
4 201862
5 201451
6 201150
7 201346
8 201042
9 201035
10 200531
11 201928
12 201125
13 201824
14 201923
15 201923
16 201623
17 201622
18 200721
19 200520
20 201720

About Mark Jermy

Mark Jermy is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Applied Mathematics, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (18 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (14 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (13 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (12 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (12 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (11 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (10 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (429 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (12 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (78 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (77 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (311 citations). Mark Jermy has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Patrick H. Geoghegan, Nicolas Buchmann, C. J. T. Spence, D.A. Greenhalgh, Michael Taylor, Paul D. Docherty, Stephen Moore, Mathieu Sellier, Wei Hua Ho and Edouard Berrocal. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Experiments in Fluids, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Computers & Fluids and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026