Mark Janssen

508 total citations
22 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Mark Janssen is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Janssen has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Physiology, 4 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Janssen's work include Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Mark Janssen is often cited by papers focused on Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). Mark Janssen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Mark Janssen's co-authors include Steven Vos, Aarnout Brombacher, Erik Thibaut, Jeroen Scheerder, Carlijn B. M. Kamphuis, Dick Ettema, Carine Lallemand, Joan Dallinga, Marije Deutekom and Mathias Funk and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, PLoS ONE and Sensors.

In The Last Decade

Mark Janssen

19 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Janssen Netherlands 8 94 78 61 47 45 22 335
Carole Castanier France 11 40 0.4× 18 0.2× 200 3.3× 53 1.1× 15 0.3× 23 493
Kerli Mooses Estonia 15 135 1.4× 161 2.1× 31 0.5× 8 0.2× 74 1.6× 35 494
António Cortinhas Portugal 9 101 1.1× 63 0.8× 72 1.2× 5 0.1× 6 0.1× 11 405
Jennifer Miller United States 5 8 0.1× 117 1.5× 56 0.9× 18 0.4× 41 0.9× 18 291
David Cabello‐Manrique Spain 12 385 4.1× 19 0.2× 48 0.8× 10 0.2× 136 3.0× 56 527
Cécile Martha France 12 23 0.2× 13 0.2× 170 2.8× 49 1.0× 4 0.1× 26 351
John Archea United States 5 19 0.2× 4 0.1× 55 0.9× 18 0.4× 30 0.7× 7 288
Julie E. Taylor United States 10 29 0.3× 85 1.1× 17 0.3× 2 0.0× 19 0.4× 28 327
Alberto Férriz-Valero Spain 12 68 0.7× 21 0.3× 176 2.9× 2 0.0× 20 0.4× 74 581
Rūta Dadelienė Lithuania 11 67 0.7× 42 0.5× 31 0.5× 7 0.1× 14 0.3× 43 317

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Janssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Janssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Janssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Janssen. The network helps show where Mark Janssen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Janssen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Janssen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Janssen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Janssen. Mark Janssen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2025). Towards Surrogate Modeling for Adsorption Processes Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks. Processes. 13(9). 2824–2824.
2.
Lee, Suzan van der, Gregory Rowangould, Tammy M. Thompson, et al.. (2025). Intercomparison of Modeled Urban-Scale Vehicle NOx and PM2.5 Emissions–Implications for Equity Assessments. Environmental Science & Technology. 59(9). 4560–4570. 1 indexed citations
3.
O’Sullivan, Siobhán, Mark Janssen, Andreas Holzinger, et al.. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): closing the gap between image analysis and navigation in complex invasive diagnostic procedures. World Journal of Urology. 40(5). 1125–1134. 16 indexed citations
4.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2022). Two of a Kind? Similarities and Differences between Runners and Walkers in Sociodemographic Characteristics, Sports Related Characteristics and Wearable Usage. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(15). 9284–9284. 3 indexed citations
5.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2020). How Do Runners Experience Personalization of Their Training Scheme: The Inspirun E-Coach?. Sensors. 20(16). 4590–4590. 9 indexed citations
6.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2020). Runner’s Perceptions of Reasons to Quit Running: Influence of Gender, Age and Running-Related Characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(17). 6046–6046. 20 indexed citations
7.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2020). Understanding Different Types of Recreational Runners and How They Use Running-Related Technology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(7). 2276–2276. 56 indexed citations
8.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2020). Which app to choose? : An online tool that supports the decision-making process of recreational runners to choose an app. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg). 2.
10.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2018). Tailored Feedback Requirements for Optimal Motor Learning: A Screening and Validation of Four Consumer Available Running Wearables. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 198–198. 2 indexed citations
11.
Janssen, Mark, Jeroen Scheerder, Erik Thibaut, Aarnout Brombacher, & Steven Vos. (2017). Who uses running apps and sports watches? Determinants and consumer profiles of event runners’ usage of running-related smartphone applications and sports watches. PLoS ONE. 12(7). e0181167–e0181167. 96 indexed citations
12.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2016). De rol van innovatieve technologie in het stimuleren van sport en bewegen in de steden Amsterdam en Eindhoven. 34(2). 43–57. 3 indexed citations
13.
14.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2016). Run! : developing a high tech running path in the park. TU/e Research Portal. 1 indexed citations
15.
Janssen, Mark, et al.. (2015). Creating light and personalised running experiences : an app development study. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 5 indexed citations
16.
Jager, Wander, et al.. (2002). How uncertainty stimulates over-harvesting in a resource dilemma. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 22(3). 247–263. 2 indexed citations
17.
Beukering, P.J.H. van, Mark Janssen, & H.S.J. Cesar. (2001). Economic valuation of the Leuser ecosystem on Sumatra, Indonesia: A stakeholder perspective. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
18.
Jäger, Wiebke, et al.. (1999). Consumats in a common dilemma. Testing the behavioural rules of simulated consumers. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).
19.
Janssen, Mark, Charles Vlek, & Wander Jager. (1999). Consumats in a commons dilemma: Testing the behavioral rules of simulated consumers. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 2 indexed citations
20.
Leemans, Rik, et al.. (1998). The IMAGE User Support System. Global Change Scenarios from IMAGE 2.1. Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026