Mark J. VanGessel

3.1k total citations
92 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Mark J. VanGessel is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark J. VanGessel has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 87 papers in Plant Science, 34 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 23 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in Mark J. VanGessel's work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (71 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (33 papers) and Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (23 papers). Mark J. VanGessel is often cited by papers focused on Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (71 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (33 papers) and Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (23 papers). Mark J. VanGessel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Netherlands. Mark J. VanGessel's co-authors include Joseph Dauer, David A. Mortensen, Bradley A. Majek, Barbara A. Scott, A.O. Ayeni, Micheal D. K. Owen, William S. Curran, Ian A. Zelaya, Wesley J. Everman and Karen A. Renner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

In The Last Decade

Mark J. VanGessel

86 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark J. VanGessel United States 25 2.2k 791 615 395 252 92 2.4k
Kevin W. Bradley United States 24 2.1k 1.0× 979 1.2× 507 0.8× 378 1.0× 130 0.5× 80 2.3k
Dean M Peterson United States 30 2.4k 1.1× 839 1.1× 526 0.9× 561 1.4× 367 1.5× 89 2.7k
David E. Stoltenberg United States 24 1.5k 0.7× 462 0.6× 663 1.1× 168 0.4× 272 1.1× 83 1.8k
Clifford H. Koger United States 24 1.6k 0.7× 766 1.0× 243 0.4× 398 1.0× 228 0.9× 54 1.8k
Karen A. Renner United States 31 2.5k 1.1× 538 0.7× 892 1.5× 155 0.4× 356 1.4× 101 2.8k
Allan S. Hamill Canada 24 1.4k 0.6× 492 0.6× 621 1.0× 130 0.3× 317 1.3× 77 1.7k
J. Anita Dille United States 22 1.2k 0.5× 339 0.4× 536 0.9× 138 0.3× 301 1.2× 60 1.5k
Art Diggle Australia 25 1.9k 0.9× 191 0.2× 433 0.7× 135 0.3× 414 1.6× 61 2.2k
Jason A. Bond United States 24 1.8k 0.8× 744 0.9× 350 0.6× 335 0.8× 180 0.7× 113 1.9k
Keith L. Edmisten United States 20 1.2k 0.6× 236 0.3× 346 0.6× 271 0.7× 267 1.1× 79 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. VanGessel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. VanGessel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. VanGessel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. VanGessel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. VanGessel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. VanGessel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. VanGessel. The network helps show where Mark J. VanGessel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. VanGessel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. VanGessel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. VanGessel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. VanGessel. Mark J. VanGessel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pavlović, Pavle, Jed B. Colquhoun, Nicholas E. Korres, et al.. (2025). Crop and Weed Management Practices of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Production Fields in the United States. HortScience. 60(3). 267–272.
2.
Pavlović, Pavle, Jed B. Colquhoun, Nicholas E. Korres, et al.. (2024). Weed communities of snap bean fields in the United States. Weed Science. 73. 1 indexed citations
4.
Needelman, Brian A., Victoria J. Ackroyd, Muthukumar Bagavathiannan, et al.. (2024). Early‐season biomass and weather enable robust cereal rye cover crop biomass predictions. Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 9(1). 3 indexed citations
5.
Everts, Kathryne L., et al.. (2024). Influence of weed species and density on lima bean yield and other pests. Frontiers in Agronomy. 6.
6.
Sosnoskie, Lynn M., et al.. (2024). Varietal Tolerance of Cucurbitaceous Crops with S-metolachlor Applied Postemergence. HortTechnology. 34(3). 388–395. 1 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Jarrod O., Amy L. Shober, & Mark J. VanGessel. (2022). Post‐harvest drone flights to measure weed growth and yield associations. Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 7(1). 2 indexed citations
8.
VanGessel, Mark J., et al.. (2022). Cereal rye seeding rate does not affect magnitude of weed suppression when planting green within Mid-Atlantic United States. Weed Technology. 36(6). 838–843. 6 indexed citations
9.
Flessner, Michael L., Ian C. Burke, J. Anita Dille, et al.. (2021). Potential wheat yield loss due to weeds in the United States and Canada. Weed Technology. 35(6). 916–923. 41 indexed citations
10.
VanGessel, Mark J., et al.. (2020). Palmer amaranth control, fecundity, and seed viability from soybean herbicides applied at first female inflorescence. Weed Technology. 35(3). 426–432. 4 indexed citations
11.
Shergill, Lovreet S., Lauren M. Schwartz‐Lazaro, Ramón G. León, et al.. (2020). Current outlook and future research needs for harvest weed seed control in North American cropping systems. Pest Management Science. 76(12). 3887–3895. 24 indexed citations
12.
Wallace, John M., et al.. (2020). Alternative performance targets for integrating cover crops as a proactive herbicide-resistance management tool. Weed Science. 68(5). 534–544. 34 indexed citations
13.
VanGessel, Mark J., et al.. (2019). Spring-seeded cereal rye suppresses weeds in watermelon. Weed Technology. 34(1). 42–47. 7 indexed citations
14.
Soltani, Nader, J. Anita Dille, Ian C. Burke, et al.. (2017). Perspectives on Potential Soybean Yield Losses from Weeds in North America. Weed Technology. 31(1). 148–154. 108 indexed citations
15.
Soltani, Nader, J. Anita Dille, Ian C. Burke, et al.. (2016). Potential Corn Yield Losses from Weeds in North America. Weed Technology. 30(4). 979–984. 136 indexed citations
16.
VanGessel, Mark J., et al.. (2009). Influence of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Growth Stage on Response to Glyphosate Applications. Weed Technology. 23(1). 49–53. 37 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Barbara A. & Mark J. VanGessel. (2007). Delaware Soybean Grower Survey on Glyphosate-resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technology. 21(1). 270–274. 21 indexed citations
18.
Hough‐Goldstein, Judith, et al.. (2004). Manipulation of Weed Communities to Enhance Ground-Dwelling Arthropod Populations in Herbicide-Resistant Field Corn. Environmental Entomology. 33(3). 577–586. 19 indexed citations
19.
VanGessel, Mark J., et al.. (2001). Narrow Row Spacing Does Not Affect Lima Bean Yield or Management of Weeds and Other Pests. HortScience. 36(5). 884–888. 5 indexed citations
20.
VanGessel, Mark J. & Harold D. Coble. (1993). Maize Dwarf Mosaic Virus Severity in Corn When Infected Johnsongrass is Controlled with a Postemergence Herbicide. Weed Science. 41(2). 262–268. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026