Mark J. Pello

707 citations
23 papers · 531 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Pello

23 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Mark J. Pello
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Biochemistry 196
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 111
  • Emergency Medicine 74
  • Hematology 70
  • Surgery 243
Replace M. Tylman with:
M. Tylman Sweden
Rudolph C. Camishion United States
Ángel Herruzo-Avilés Spain
Danielle Robitaille Canada
Torstein Jensen Norway
Glenn W. Laub United States
Vladimir Birjiniuk United States
Valter Casati Italy
Laura Baker Canada
Kai Johanning Germany
Mark J. Pello relative to M. Tylman Sweden M. Tylman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
M. Tylman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Pello

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Pello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Pello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Pello more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Pello

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Pello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Pello. The network helps show where Mark J. Pello may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Pello, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Pello Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Pello links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200893
2 20028
3
A comparison of laparoscopic and open appendectomy.
199921
4 19973
5 19954
6 199515
7 199514
8 199514
9 199418
10
A survey of preferred approach to inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or inguinal incision?
199412
11 19945
12 19921
13 19923
14 199212
15
Is hemoglobin level alone a reliable predictor of outcome in the severely anemic surgical patient?
199234
16 199241
17 19901
18 1990133
19 199050
20 19885

About Mark J. Pello

Mark J. Pello is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Hernia repair and management (3 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (3 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (2 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (196 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (111 citations), Emergency Medicine (74 citations), Hematology (70 citations) and Surgery (243 citations). Mark J. Pello has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Ríchard K. Spence, Umur Atabek, James B. Alexander, E. Douglas Norcross, Sue McCoy, Rudolph C. Camishion, Jeffrey Carson, Roy M. Poses, Brian R. Kann and Robert L. Simons. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, The American Journal of Surgery, Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery and The American Surgeon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026