Mark J. Hackett
Impact in
- Biophysics top 1%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Structural Biology top 5%
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 7
-
- Trace Elements in Health 19
- Co-authors
- Graham N. George (19 shared papers)Ingrid J. Pickering (18 shared papers)M. Jake Pushie (14 shared papers)Małgorzata Korbas (2 shared papers)Phyllis G. Paterson (12 shared papers)Peter A. Lay (8 shared papers)Sally Caine (10 shared papers)Virginie Lam (15 shared papers)
- Journals
- ACS Chemical Neuroscience (11 papers)The Analyst (11 papers)Metallomics (8 papers)Analytical Chemistry (4 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Hackett
98 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
- Biophysics 304
- Structural Biology 44
- Radiation 250
- Nutrition and Dietetics 429
- Analytical Chemistry 213
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Hackett
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Hackett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Hackett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Hackett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Hackett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Hackett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Hackett. The network helps show where Mark J. Hackett may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Hackett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 246 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 161 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 123 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 55 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 31 |
About Mark J. Hackett
Mark J. Hackett is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biophysics, Physiology and Spectroscopy, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trace Elements in Health (19 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (14 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (10 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (304 citations), Structural Biology (44 citations), Radiation (250 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (429 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (213 citations). Mark J. Hackett has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Graham N. George, Ingrid J. Pickering, M. Jake Pushie, Małgorzata Korbas, Phyllis G. Paterson, Peter A. Lay, Sally Caine, Virginie Lam, Jade B. Aitken and Michael Kelly. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, The Analyst, Metallomics, Analytical Chemistry and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.