Mark J. Dresden
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
- Archeology top 2%
- Ancient Near East History
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 16
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 15
- Archeology 15
- Ancient Near East History 12
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 4
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Ehsan Yarshater (1 shared paper)A. J. Arberry (1 shared paper)Mary Boyce (1 shared paper)Prods Oktor Skjærvø (3 shared papers)H. W. Bailey (1 shared paper)Rüdiger Schmitt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (27 papers)The Classical World (1 paper)Language (1 paper)Lingua (1 paper)Transactions of the American Philosophical Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Dresden
25 papers receiving 216 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Anthropology 139
- Archeology 124
- Classics 43
- Language and Linguistics 110
- Religious studies 23
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Dresden
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Dresden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Dresden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Dresden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Dresden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Dresden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Dresden. The network helps show where Mark J. Dresden may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Dresden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1972 | 41 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 35 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1958 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1958 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1960 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1955 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1955 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1977 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1964 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1972 | 2 |
About Mark J. Dresden
Mark J. Dresden is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eurasian Exchange Networks (15 papers), Ancient Near East History (12 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (9 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (8 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (139 citations), Archeology (124 citations), Classics (43 citations), Language and Linguistics (110 citations) and Religious studies (23 citations). Mark J. Dresden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ehsan Yarshater, A. J. Arberry, Mary Boyce, Prods Oktor Skjærvø, H. W. Bailey and Rüdiger Schmitt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, The Classical World, Language, Lingua and Transactions of the American Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.