Mark Hills
Impact in
- Aging top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Papers in
-
- Logic, programming, and type systems 21
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 5
- Co-authors
- Peter M. Lansdorp (14 shared papers)Geraldine Aubert (2 shared papers)Ester Falconer (6 shared papers)Ashley D. Sanders (5 shared papers)Hilda A. Pickett (3 shared papers)Michael D. Stutz (2 shared papers)Roger R. Reddel (2 shared papers)Dimitri Conomos (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Blood (4 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Genome Research (2 papers)Science of Computer Programming (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mark Hills
48 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Aging 86
- Physiology 576
- Software 51
- Molecular Biology 730
- Cancer Research 101
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hills
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hills
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hills. The network helps show where Mark Hills may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 254 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 115 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 115 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 79 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 16 |
About Mark Hills
Mark Hills is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (21 papers), Software Engineering Research (11 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (10 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (10 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers) and Web Application Security Vulnerabilities (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (86 citations), Physiology (576 citations), Software (51 citations), Molecular Biology (730 citations) and Cancer Research (101 citations). Mark Hills has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Lansdorp, Geraldine Aubert, Ester Falconer, Ashley D. Sanders, Hilda A. Pickett, Michael D. Stutz, Roger R. Reddel, Dimitri Conomos, Paul Klint and Grigore Roşu. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Nucleic Acids Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genome Research and Science of Computer Programming.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.