Mark Haberkamp

753 total citations
8 papers, 634 citations indexed

About

Mark Haberkamp is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Haberkamp has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 634 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cell Biology, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Mark Haberkamp's work include Hemoglobin structure and function (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers). Mark Haberkamp is often cited by papers focused on Hemoglobin structure and function (5 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (4 papers) and Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers). Mark Haberkamp collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and France. Mark Haberkamp's co-authors include Thomas Hankeln, Thorsten Burmester, Christine Fuchs, Marc Schmidt, Anja Roesner, Bettina Ebner, Frank Gerlach, Tilmann Laufs, Sylvia Wystub and Bettina Weich and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Brain Research and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

In The Last Decade

Mark Haberkamp

8 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Haberkamp Germany	8	543	308	229	128	120	8	634
Christian E. Rocheleau Canada	14	288 0.5×	1.1k 3.5×	103 0.4×	26 0.2×	171 1.4×	22	1.4k
Jochen Scheel Germany	8	582 1.1×	604 2.0×	74 0.3×	9 0.1×	39 0.3×	12	934
Barry Denholm United Kingdom	15	237 0.4×	468 1.5×	52 0.2×	17 0.1×	25 0.2×	27	837
Peter J. Schweinsberg United States	9	285 0.5×	368 1.2×	85 0.4×	14 0.1×	66 0.6×	9	641
Jason Pellettieri United States	11	162 0.3×	793 2.6×	43 0.2×	7 0.1×	31 0.3×	14	1.0k
Aaron F. Severson United States	13	797 1.5×	1.1k 3.6×	49 0.2×	29 0.2×	56 0.5×	17	1.5k
Anton Karabinoš Germany	17	295 0.5×	581 1.9×	65 0.3×	5 0.0×	77 0.6×	33	804
Marta Codina Spain	9	44 0.1×	233 0.8×	78 0.3×	18 0.1×	20 0.2×	9	579
Christopher A. Shelton United States	8	192 0.4×	479 1.6×	64 0.3×	8 0.1×	75 0.6×	12	775
Vanesa Jiménez-Amilburu Germany	11	127 0.2×	254 0.8×	54 0.2×	8 0.1×	8 0.1×	12	475

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Haberkamp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Haberkamp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Haberkamp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Haberkamp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Haberkamp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Haberkamp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Haberkamp. The network helps show where Mark Haberkamp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Haberkamp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Haberkamp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Haberkamp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Haberkamp. Mark Haberkamp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Haberkamp, Mark, et al.. (2007). A novel and ancient group of type I keratins with members in bichir, sturgeon and gar. Frontiers in Zoology. 4(1). 16–16. 14 indexed citations

2.

Schmidt‐Kastner, Rainald, Mark Haberkamp, Christoph Schmitz, Thomas Hankeln, & Thorsten Burmester. (2006). Neuroglobin mRNA expression after transient global brain ischemia and prolonged hypoxia in cell culture. Brain Research. 1103(1). 173–180. 68 indexed citations

3.

Fuchs, Christine, Valeska Heib, Laurent Kiger, et al.. (2004). Zebrafish Reveals Different and Conserved Features of Vertebrate Neuroglobin Gene Structure, Expression Pattern, and Ligand Binding. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279(23). 24116–24122. 63 indexed citations

4.

Haberkamp, Mark, et al.. (2004). Neuroglobin, cytoglobin, and a novel, eye-specific globin from chicken. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 325(3). 719–725. 78 indexed citations

5.

Burmester, Thorsten, Mark Haberkamp, Anja Roesner, et al.. (2004). Neuroglobin and Cytoglobin: Genes, Proteins and Evolution. IUBMB Life. 56(11-12). 703–707. 88 indexed citations

6.

Hankeln, Thomas, Bettina Ebner, Christine Fuchs, et al.. (2004). Neuroglobin and cytoglobin in search of their role in the vertebrate globin family. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 99(1). 110–119. 246 indexed citations

7.

Haberkamp, Mark, et al.. (2002). Type II keratin cDNAs from the rainbow trout: implications for keratin evolution. Differentiation. 70(6). 292–299. 40 indexed citations

8.

Haberkamp, Mark, et al.. (2002). Type I keratin cDNAs from the rainbow trout: independent radiation of keratins in fish. Differentiation. 70(6). 282–291. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact