Mark G. Parker

787 total citations
26 papers, 550 citations indexed

About

Mark G. Parker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies and Nephrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark G. Parker has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 550 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Gender Studies and 7 papers in Nephrology. Recurrent topics in Mark G. Parker's work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers). Mark G. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (8 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers). Mark G. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Mark G. Parker's co-authors include Tod Ibrahim, Stephen M. Sozio, Mitchell H. Rosner, Rachel Shaffer, Bruce A. Molitoris, Gilles L. Fraser, Richard R. Riker, Hitesh H. Shah, Bradley N. Doebbeling and Bruce A. Molitoris and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, American Journal of Kidney Diseases and Intensive Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mark G. Parker

24 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark G. Parker United States 14 191 163 148 135 74 26 550
Sandra R. DiBrito United States 15 100 0.5× 90 0.6× 167 1.1× 71 0.5× 46 0.6× 56 674
Rachel Shaffer United States 10 366 1.9× 160 1.0× 135 0.9× 34 0.3× 155 2.1× 12 584
Myra A. Kleinpeter United States 13 94 0.5× 77 0.5× 65 0.4× 28 0.2× 16 0.2× 26 539
Fahad Saeed United States 18 182 1.0× 193 1.2× 397 2.7× 12 0.1× 70 0.9× 67 803
Jerry Fuller United States 3 110 0.6× 87 0.5× 242 1.6× 15 0.1× 91 1.2× 3 535
Natalia S. Ivascu United States 14 55 0.3× 79 0.5× 83 0.6× 23 0.2× 14 0.2× 38 780
Nancy Armistead United States 12 357 1.9× 167 1.0× 340 2.3× 15 0.1× 148 2.0× 17 930
Tanya S. Johns United States 10 219 1.1× 102 0.6× 76 0.5× 7 0.1× 64 0.9× 17 691
Justin D. Schrager United States 14 40 0.2× 110 0.7× 120 0.8× 9 0.1× 70 0.9× 21 622
Olesya Baker United States 16 22 0.1× 183 1.1× 484 3.3× 82 0.6× 119 1.6× 45 847

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G. Parker. The network helps show where Mark G. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark G. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark G. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark G. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark G. Parker. Mark G. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parker, Mark G., et al.. (2024). Exploring attitudinal barriers to participation in inpatient fall risk assessment using the Theoretical Domains Framework: A survey of providers. Health Science Reports. 7(4). e2000–e2000. 1 indexed citations
2.
Parker, Mark G. & Stephen M. Sozio. (2021). The Future Nephrology Workforce: There Will Be One. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 16(11). 1752–1754. 9 indexed citations
3.
Fairfield, Kathleen M., Peter Bates, Erin Graydon-Baker, et al.. (2020). Development of a Certificate in Healthcare Improvement for Inter-Professional Teams. 2(2).
4.
Sozio, Stephen M., Hitesh H. Shah, Harini A. Chakkera, et al.. (2019). Increasing Medical Student Interest in Nephrology. American Journal of Nephrology. 50(1). 4–10. 14 indexed citations
5.
Bayliss, George, Brian S. Decker, Richard Hellman, et al.. (2019). Kidney Mentoring and Assessment Program for Students: a guide for engaging medical students in nephrology. Clinical Kidney Journal. 12(6). 761–766. 11 indexed citations
6.
Zimmerman, Robert F., et al.. (2018). Quality measures in acute kidney injury. Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension. 27(2). 130–135. 5 indexed citations
7.
Garlo, Katherine, et al.. (2015). Severity of Anemia Predicts Hospital Length of Stay but Not Readmission in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Medicine. 94(25). e964–e964. 21 indexed citations
8.
Hsu, Chi‐yuan, Mark G. Parker, Michael J. Ross, Rebecca J. Schmidt, & Raymond C. Harris. (2015). Improving the Nephrology Match. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 26(11). 2634–2639. 16 indexed citations
9.
Kohan, Donald E., Mark G. Parker, Susan L. Furth, et al.. (2014). Propagating the Nephrology Research Workforce. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 9(6). 1144–1147. 7 indexed citations
10.
Parker, Mark G., et al.. (2013). Recruiting the Next Generation of Nephrologists. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 20(4). 326–335. 37 indexed citations
11.
Jhaveri, Kenar D., Matthew A. Sparks, Hitesh H. Shah, et al.. (2013). Why Not Nephrology? A Survey of US Internal Medicine Subspecialty Fellows. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 61(4). 540–546. 92 indexed citations
12.
Parker, Mark G., Tod Ibrahim, Rachel Shaffer, Mitchell H. Rosner, & Bruce A. Molitoris. (2011). The Future Nephrology Workforce. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 6(6). 1501–1506. 85 indexed citations
13.
Parker, Mark G. & Bradley N. Doebbeling. (2011). The Challenge of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prevention in Hemodialysis Therapy. Seminars in Dialysis. 25(1). 42–49. 19 indexed citations
14.
Parker, Mark G.. (2010). Nephrology Training in the 21st Century: Toward Outcomes-Based Education. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 56(1). 132–142. 11 indexed citations
15.
16.
Vella, John P., et al.. (2010). Kidney allograft biopsy: timing to complications. Clinical Nephrology. 74(7). 39–45. 24 indexed citations
17.
Rosner, Mitchell H., Jeffrey S. Berns, Mark G. Parker, et al.. (2009). Development, Implementation, and Results of the ASN In-Training Examination for Fellows. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 5(2). 328–334. 12 indexed citations
18.
Parker, Mark G.. (2008). Resistant Hypertension: Core Curriculum 2008. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 52(4). 796–802.
19.
Parker, Mark G., et al.. (2001). Removal of propylene glycol and correction of increased osmolar gap by hemodialysis in a patient on high dose lorazepam infusion therapy. Intensive Care Medicine. 28(1). 81–84. 52 indexed citations
20.
Parker, Mark G., et al.. (1997). Profound hypophosphatemia and isolated hyperphosphaturia in two cases of multiple myeloma. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 29(3). 445–448. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra R. DiBrito Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Shaffer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Myra A. Kleinpeter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Fahad Saeed Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jerry Fuller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalia S. Ivascu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nancy Armistead Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tanya S. Johns Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Justin D. Schrager Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Olesya Baker
Rankless by CCL
2026