Mark G. Novak

646 total citations
22 papers, 480 citations indexed

About

Mark G. Novak is a scholar working on Insect Science, Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark G. Novak has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 480 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Insect Science, 9 papers in Infectious Diseases and 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Mark G. Novak's work include Viral Infections and Vectors (9 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers). Mark G. Novak is often cited by papers focused on Viral Infections and Vectors (9 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (6 papers). Mark G. Novak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Uganda. Mark G. Novak's co-authors include Wayne A. Rowley, Leon G. Higley, José M. C. Ribeiro, John G. Hildebrand, Pierre E. Rollin, James R. Tucker, John J. Obrycki, Curtis L. Fritz, James Bing and W. D. Guthrie and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Emerging infectious diseases and Journal of Experimental Biology.

In The Last Decade

Mark G. Novak

21 papers receiving 456 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark G. Novak United States 11 204 187 135 100 91 22 480
Tara Thiemann United States 17 314 1.5× 539 2.9× 112 0.8× 76 0.8× 75 0.8× 28 673
Suchada Sumruayphol Thailand 16 103 0.5× 318 1.7× 131 1.0× 59 0.6× 85 0.9× 32 556
David R. Mercer United States 18 205 1.0× 436 2.3× 320 2.4× 77 0.8× 106 1.2× 35 725
Derek Roberts Oman 12 85 0.4× 177 0.9× 94 0.7× 58 0.6× 83 0.9× 35 396
J. W. Wekesa United States 12 148 0.7× 246 1.3× 120 0.9× 39 0.4× 63 0.7× 16 412
Stjepan Krčmar Croatia 13 182 0.9× 148 0.8× 280 2.1× 65 0.7× 181 2.0× 76 557
R. A. Brust Canada 16 131 0.6× 325 1.7× 246 1.8× 222 2.2× 167 1.8× 70 661
Takashi Tsunoda Japan 10 120 0.6× 144 0.8× 110 0.8× 43 0.4× 93 1.0× 24 318
Erik M. Blosser United States 13 247 1.2× 289 1.5× 127 0.9× 58 0.6× 170 1.9× 25 503
Bjørn Arne Rukke Norway 13 191 0.9× 58 0.3× 164 1.2× 74 0.7× 89 1.0× 26 438

Countries citing papers authored by Mark G. Novak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark G. Novak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark G. Novak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark G. Novak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark G. Novak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark G. Novak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark G. Novak. The network helps show where Mark G. Novak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark G. Novak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark G. Novak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark G. Novak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark G. Novak. Mark G. Novak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Waller, Lance A., et al.. (2023). A Shared Latent Process Model to Correct for Preferential Sampling in Disease Surveillance Systems. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics. 28(3). 483–501. 2 indexed citations
3.
Padgett, Kerry A., Anne M. Kjemtrup, Mark G. Novak, Jason O. Velez, & Nicholas A. Panella. (2022). Colorado Tick Fever Virus in the Far West: Forgotten, but Not Gone. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 22(8). 443–448. 7 indexed citations
4.
Eads, David A., Dean E. Biggins, Jeffrey Wimsatt, et al.. (2022). Exploring and Mitigating Plague for One Health Purposes. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 9(4). 169–184. 5 indexed citations
6.
Messenger, Sharon, Danielle Buttke, George C. Carroll, et al.. (2020). Long-Term Rodent Surveillance after Outbreak of Hantavirus Infection, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2012. Emerging infectious diseases. 26(3). 560–567. 6 indexed citations
7.
Tucker, James R., et al.. (2018). The Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) as an Enzootic Reservoir of Plague in California. EcoHealth. 15(3). 566–576. 8 indexed citations
8.
Novak, Mark G., Jeannine M. Petersen, Paul S. Mead, et al.. (2016). Investigation of and Response to 2 Plague Cases, Yosemite National Park, California, USA, 2015. Emerging infectious diseases. 22(12). 19 indexed citations
9.
Tucker, James R., et al.. (2011). Avian Hosts of Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae) and the Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in Larvae Feeding on the Oregon Junco. Journal of Medical Entomology. 48(4). 852–859. 11 indexed citations
10.
Novak, Mark G., et al.. (2010). Public Health Pesticide Use in California: A Comparative Summary. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 26(3). 349–353. 2 indexed citations
11.
Kwan, Jonathan, et al.. (2009). Mortality of Nontarget Arthropods from An Aerial Application of Pyrethrins. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. 25(2). 218–220. 10 indexed citations
12.
Fritz, Curtis L., et al.. (2008). Occupational Risk of Exposure to Rodent-borne Hantavirus at US Forest Service Facilities in California. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 78(2). 352–357. 10 indexed citations
13.
Mills, James N., Thomas G. Ksiazek, B. A. Ellis, et al.. (1998). A survey of hantavirus antibody in small-mammal populations in selected United States National Parks.. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 58(4). 525–532. 82 indexed citations
14.
Novak, Mark G., José M. C. Ribeiro, & John G. Hildebrand. (1995). 5-Hydroxytryptamine in the Salivary glands Of Adult Female Aedes Aegypti and its Role in Regulation of Salivation. Journal of Experimental Biology. 198(1). 167–174. 51 indexed citations
15.
Novak, Mark G. & Wayne A. Rowley. (1994). Serotonin Depletion Affects Blood-Feeding but Not Host-Seeking Ability in Aedes triseriatus (Diptera: Culieidae). Journal of Medical Entomology. 31(4). 600–606. 43 indexed citations
16.
Novak, Mark G., et al.. (1993). Evaluating Larval Competition BetweenAedes albopictusandA. triseriatus(Diptera: Culicidae) through Replacement Series Experiments. Environmental Entomology. 22(2). 311–318. 97 indexed citations
17.
Platt, Kenneth B., Mark G. Novak, & Wayne A. Rowley. (1992). Studies on the Biology of Ixodes dammini in the Upper Midwest of the United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 653(1). 78–87. 8 indexed citations
18.
Rowley, Wayne A., et al.. (1992). Rates of Borrelia burgdorferi Infection in lxodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) in Southwestern Wisconsin. Journal of Medical Entomology. 29(2). 314–317. 7 indexed citations
19.
Novak, Mark G., et al.. (1991). lxodes dammini (Acari, Ixodidae) and Borrelia burgdorferi in Iowa. The Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science. 98(2). 99–101. 6 indexed citations
20.
Novak, Mark G., et al.. (1991). Comparison of four membranes for artificially bloodfeeding mosquitoes.. PubMed. 7(2). 327–9. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026