Mark F. Vitha

1.3k total citations
31 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Mark F. Vitha is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Biomedical Engineering and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark F. Vitha has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Spectroscopy, 11 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 7 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Mark F. Vitha's work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (18 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (7 papers) and Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers). Mark F. Vitha is often cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (18 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (7 papers) and Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers). Mark F. Vitha collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Spain. Mark F. Vitha's co-authors include Peter W. Carr, Ronald J. Clarke, Jeff D. Weckwerth, Nigel Turner, David E. Hibbs, Mark P. Waller, Andrew J. Dallas, Gaëlle Le Goff, Dwight R. Stoll and Marı́a Luisa Marina and has published in prestigious journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mark F. Vitha

30 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark F. Vitha United States 18 683 363 339 286 164 31 1.1k
Chau My Du United Kingdom 11 434 0.6× 207 0.6× 163 0.5× 156 0.5× 116 0.7× 13 697
Anant Vailaya United States 12 599 0.9× 224 0.6× 297 0.9× 308 1.1× 69 0.4× 15 814
Thomas H. Walter United States 20 1.2k 1.8× 648 1.8× 375 1.1× 472 1.7× 96 0.6× 39 1.6k
Udo H. Verkerk Canada 20 1.2k 1.7× 263 0.7× 462 1.4× 129 0.5× 166 1.0× 38 1.7k
Ute Pyell Germany 26 973 1.4× 1.4k 3.8× 230 0.7× 199 0.7× 85 0.5× 92 1.9k
Bernhard Koppenhoefer Germany 23 979 1.4× 608 1.7× 272 0.8× 165 0.6× 238 1.5× 69 1.4k
Vincenzo Cucinotta Italy 23 769 1.1× 551 1.5× 345 1.0× 64 0.2× 286 1.7× 68 1.4k
Igor A. Sedov Russia 23 361 0.5× 245 0.7× 178 0.5× 28 0.1× 442 2.7× 88 1.3k
Markus Juza Germany 22 793 1.2× 517 1.4× 504 1.5× 175 0.6× 151 0.9× 37 1.2k
Binyamin Feibush United States 24 1.5k 2.1× 563 1.6× 565 1.7× 429 1.5× 218 1.3× 43 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Vitha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Vitha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Vitha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Vitha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Vitha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Vitha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Vitha. The network helps show where Mark F. Vitha may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark F. Vitha

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark F. Vitha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark F. Vitha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark F. Vitha. Mark F. Vitha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gionfriddo, Emanuela, et al.. (2023). Threshold Concepts in Analytical Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 100(2). 427–431. 3 indexed citations
2.
Vitha, Mark F.. (2022). Short Gas Chromatography Experiment That Richly Connects Thermodynamics to the Intermolecular Interactions That Govern Solute Retention. Journal of Chemical Education. 99(5). 1923–1930. 2 indexed citations
3.
Vitha, Mark F.. (2022). Contemplative Fridays: Mindfulness Pedagogy in the General Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education. 99(7). 2441–2445. 4 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Andrew R., Carrie Johnson, Dwight R. Stoll, & Mark F. Vitha. (2012). Identifying orthogonal and similar reversed phase liquid chromatography stationary phases using the system selectivity cube and the hydrophobic subtraction model. Journal of Chromatography A. 1249. 62–82. 25 indexed citations
5.
Vitha, Mark F., et al.. (2010). Chromatographic selectivity triangles. Journal of Chromatography A. 1218(4). 556–586. 37 indexed citations
6.
Vitha, Mark F., et al.. (2009). Paths to Knowledge as a Foundational Course in an Honors Program. Insecta mundi. 5. 135. 1 indexed citations
7.
Turner, Nigel, et al.. (2006). Cholesterol Effect on the Dipole Potential of Lipid Membranes. Biophysical Journal. 90(11). 4060–4070. 126 indexed citations
8.
Goff, Gaëlle Le, Mark F. Vitha, & Ronald J. Clarke. (2006). Orientational polarisability of lipid membrane surfaces. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1768(3). 562–570. 37 indexed citations
9.
Vitha, Mark F. & Ronald J. Clarke. (2006). Comparison of excitation and emission ratiometric fluorescence methods for quantifying the membrane dipole potential. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1768(1). 107–114. 43 indexed citations
10.
Vitha, Mark F. & Peter W. Carr. (2006). The chemical interpretation and practice of linear solvation energy relationships in chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 1126(1-2). 143–194. 430 indexed citations
11.
Vitha, Mark F., Peter W. Carr, & Gary A. Mabbott. (2005). Appropriate Use of Blanks, Standards, and Controls in Chemical Measurements. Journal of Chemical Education. 82(6). 901–901. 5 indexed citations
12.
Vitha, Mark F., et al.. (2002). Mechanistic implications of the equality of compensation temperatures in chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 946(1-2). 47–49. 36 indexed citations
13.
Weckwerth, Jeff D., Mark F. Vitha, & Peter W. Carr. (2001). The development and determination of chemically distinct solute parameters for use in linear solvation energy relationships. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 183-184. 143–157. 19 indexed citations
15.
García, Maria Ángeles, et al.. (2001). Study of retention in micellar liquid chromatography on a C8 column by the use of linear solvation energy relationships. Journal of Chromatography A. 918(1). 1–11. 17 indexed citations
16.
García, Maria Ángeles, Mark F. Vitha, & Marı́a Luisa Marina. (2000). LINEAR SOLVATION ENERGY RELATIONSHIP STUDY OF RETENTION IN MICELLAR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY ON A C18 COLUMN USING SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE AND CETYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM BROMIDE MOBILE PHASES WITH ALCOHOL MODIFIERS. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies. 23(6). 873–895. 12 indexed citations
17.
Weckwerth, Jeff D., et al.. (1998). A Comparison of Gas−Hexadecane and Gas−Apolane Partition Coefficients. Analytical Chemistry. 70(17). 3712–3716. 20 indexed citations
19.
Vitha, Mark F. & Peter W. Carr. (1998). Study of the Polarity and Hydrogen-Bond Ability of Dodecyltrimethylammonium Bromide Micelles by the Kamlet−Taft Solvatochromic Comparison Method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 102(11). 1888–1895. 44 indexed citations
20.
Vitha, Mark F., Andrew J. Dallas, & Peter W. Carr. (1997). A Comparison of Water–Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Phase Transfer Linear Solvation Energy Relationships and Databases. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 187(1). 179–183. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026