Mark F. Teaford
- Paleontology top 0.1%
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Anthropology top 0.05%
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Archeology top 0.05%
- Co-authors
- Peter S. UngarAlan WalkerFrederick E. GrineOrdean J. OyenRobert S. ScottTimothy P. WeihsA. MannKenneth J. T. Livi
- Topics
- Primate Behavior and Ecology (84 papers)Evolution and Paleontology Studies (35 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Mark F. Teaford
113 papers receiving 7.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Paleontology 3.5k
- Social Psychology 3.5k
- Anthropology 2.8k
- Ecology 2.3k
- Archeology 1.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Mark F. Teaford
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark F. Teaford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark F. Teaford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark F. Teaford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark F. Teaford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark F. Teaford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark F. Teaford. The network helps show where Mark F. Teaford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark F. Teaford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark F. Teaford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark F. Teaford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark F. Teaford. Mark F. Teaford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | The relationship between dental topography and dental microwear in Sapajus apella | 1 |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 195 | |
| 12 | Diet in Early Homo: A Review of the Evidence and a New Model of Adaptive Versatility | 4 |
| 13 | Was the Early Pliocene hominin 'Australopithecus' anamensis a hard object feeder? | 41 |
| 14 | 91 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 77 | |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Mark F. Teaford
Mark F. Teaford is a scholar working on Paleontology, Developmental Biology and Social Psychology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (84 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (35 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (3.5k citations), Anthropology (2.8k citations) and Social Psychology (3.5k citations). Mark F. Teaford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter S. Ungar, Alan Walker, Frederick E. Grine, Ordean J. Oyen, Robert S. Scott, Timothy P. Weihs, A. Mann, Kenneth J. T. Livi, Christopher Brown and Kenneth E. Glander. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.