Mark E. Totten

449 total citations
20 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

Mark E. Totten is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Totten has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 1 paper in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Totten's work include Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (6 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers). Mark E. Totten is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (6 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers). Mark E. Totten collaborates with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Mark E. Totten's co-authors include Susan M. Paddock, José J. Escarce, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, Debra Saliba, James Hosek, Grace M. Carter, Cheryl L. Damberg, Denis Agniel, Catherine A. Sarkisian and John N. Mafi and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA Network Open, Health Services Research and Defence and Peace Economics.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Totten

16 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark E. Totten United States	10	182	150	56	49	40	20	319
Janet P. Sutton United States	12	151 0.8×	98 0.7×	67 1.2×	30 0.6×	12 0.3×	29	334
Ruth Thorlby United Kingdom	9	232 1.3×	96 0.6×	32 0.6×	28 0.6×	8 0.2×	21	375
Candace Imison United Kingdom	9	189 1.0×	70 0.5×	42 0.8×	49 1.0×	7 0.2×	22	279
Nanik Pursani United Kingdom	5	135 0.7×	67 0.4×	160 2.9×	50 1.0×	103 2.6×	5	341
Shoshana Hahn‐Goldberg Canada	10	105 0.6×	42 0.3×	39 0.7×	98 2.0×	11 0.3×	30	319
John McHugh United States	10	272 1.5×	173 1.2×	22 0.4×	68 1.4×	5 0.1×	19	352
Albert E. Bothe United States	2	165 0.9×	112 0.7×	25 0.4×	16 0.3×	7 0.2×	2	262
Jim Wardrope United Kingdom	5	112 0.6×	52 0.3×	36 0.6×	142 2.9×	9 0.2×	5	335
Ushapoorna Nuliyalu United States	9	176 1.0×	173 1.2×	33 0.6×	72 1.5×	5 0.1×	22	358
Lynn M. Soban United States	11	184 1.0×	61 0.4×	32 0.6×	21 0.4×	74 1.9×	13	421

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Totten

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Totten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Totten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Totten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Totten

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Totten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Totten. The network helps show where Mark E. Totten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Totten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Totten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Totten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Totten. Mark E. Totten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hardison, Chaitra M., et al.. (2022). Independent Review of the Army Combat Fitness Test: Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations. RAND Corporation eBooks. 5 indexed citations

Mafi, John N., Rachel O. Reid, Scot Hickey, et al.. (2021). Trends in Low-Value Health Service Use and Spending in the US Medicare Fee-for-Service Program, 2014-2018. JAMA Network Open. 4(2). e2037328–e2037328. 64 indexed citations

Shekelle, Paul G, Joseph Pane, Denis Agniel, et al.. (2021). Assessment of Variation in Electronic Health Record Capabilities and Reported Clinical Quality Performance in Ambulatory Care Clinics, 2014-2017. JAMA Network Open. 4(4). e217476–e217476. 4 indexed citations

Kranz, Ashley M., Maria DeYoreo, Cheryl L. Damberg, et al.. (2020). Health system affiliation of physician organizations and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who have high needs. Health Services Research. 55(S3). 1118–1128. 15 indexed citations

Timbie, Justin W., Ashley M. Kranz, Maria DeYoreo, et al.. (2020). Racial and ethnic disparities in care for health system‐affiliated physician organizations and non‐affiliated physician organizations. Health Services Research. 55(S3). 1107–1117. 13 indexed citations

Miller, Laura L., Esther M. Friedman, Gabriella C. Gonzalez, et al.. (2018). An Early Evaluation of the My Career Advancement Account Scholarship for Military Spouses. RAND Corporation eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes, et al.. (2005). How much is postacute care use affected by its availability?. PubMed. 40(2). 413–34. 114 indexed citations

Buntin, Melinda Beeuwkes, et al.. (2005). Effects of Payment Changes on Trends in Access to Post-Acute Care. RAND Corporation eBooks. 10 indexed citations

Carter, Grace M. & Mark E. Totten. (2005). Preliminary Analyses for Refinement of the Tier Comorbidities in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System. 13 indexed citations

10.

Hosek, James, et al.. (2004). Can the Military Successfully Meet the Demand for Information Technology Personnel?. RAND Corporation eBooks. 1 indexed citations

11.

Hosek, James, et al.. (2004). Attracting the Best: How the Military Competes for Information Technology Personnel. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 6 indexed citations

12.

Leuschner, Kristin J., et al.. (2004). Dollar Cost Banding: A New Algorithm for Computing Inventory Levels for Army Supply Support Activities. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 4 indexed citations

13.

Asch, Beth J., et al.. (2004). Have Improved Resources Increased Military Recruiting and Retention?. RAND Corporation eBooks. 1 indexed citations

14.

Hosek, James & Mark E. Totten. (2004). The effect of deployment on first‐ and second‐term re‐enlistment in the US active duty force. Defence and Peace Economics. 15(5). 433–451. 8 indexed citations

15.

Fricker, Ronald D., James Hosek, & Mark E. Totten. (2003). How Does Deployment Affect Retention of Military Personnel?. RAND Corporation eBooks. 5 indexed citations

16.

Hosek, James & Mark E. Totten. (2002). Serving Away From Home: How Deployments Influence Reenlistment. RAND Corporation eBooks. 12 indexed citations

17.

Carter, Grace M., Joan L. Buchanan, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin, et al.. (2002). Executive Summary of Analyses for the Initial Implementation of the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 19 indexed citations

18.

Carter, Grace M., Daniel A. Relles, Barbara O. Wynn, et al.. (2000). Interim Report on an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Prospective Payment System. 15 indexed citations

19.

Hosek, James & Mark E. Totten. (1999). Does Perstempo Hurt Reenlistment?: The Effect of Long or Hostile Perstempo on Reenlistment. 9 indexed citations

20.

Hosek, James & Mark E. Totten. (1998). Does Perstempo Hurt Reenlistment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact