Mark E. Hamill

37 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Mark E. Hamill
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Emergency Medicine 98
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 46
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 21
  • Internal Medicine 19
  • Surgery 126
Replace Majed W. El Hechi with:
Majed W. El Hechi United States
Amanda Young United States
Edison Iglesias de Oliveira Vidal Brazil
Muhammad Khurrum United States
Mika Ukkonen Finland
Hans-Jürgen Heppner Germany
Mathew Edavettal United States
Sarah Welch United States
Nalan Metin Aksu Türkiye
Chiedozie Udeh United States
Mark E. Hamill relative to Majed W. El Hechi United States Majed W. El Hechi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Majed W. El Hechi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Hamill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Hamill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Hamill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Hamill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Hamill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Hamill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Hamill. The network helps show where Mark E. Hamill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark E. Hamill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark E. Hamill Line = papers co-authored together Mark E. Hamill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200940
2 201630
3 199427
4 201217
5 201914
6 201614
7 201813
8 201913
9 201812
10 201910
11 20178
12 20177
13 20157
14 20156
15 20176
16 20196
17 20216
18 20176
19 20165
20 20174

About Mark E. Hamill

Mark E. Hamill is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Internal Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 43 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (15 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (4 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (98 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (46 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (21 citations), Internal Medicine (19 citations) and Surgery (126 citations). Mark E. Hamill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Bryan R. Collier, Eric H. Bradburn, Thomas J. K. Toung, Cecil O. Borel, Helen Yates, Shahid Shafi, Terence O’Keeffe, Mark Gunst, Larry M. Gentilello and Lisa A. Hollett. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Surgical Infections and Journal of Trauma Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026