Mark E. Corkins

864 total citations
19 papers, 621 citations indexed

About

Mark E. Corkins is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Aging. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Corkins has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 621 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 4 papers in Aging. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Corkins's work include Renal and related cancers (6 papers), Trace Elements in Health (4 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers). Mark E. Corkins is often cited by papers focused on Renal and related cancers (6 papers), Trace Elements in Health (4 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers). Mark E. Corkins collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Poland. Mark E. Corkins's co-authors include Amanda Bird, Anne C. Hart, Hidetoshi Komatsu, Michael Y. Chao, Heather Dionne, Jonah Larkins‐Ford, Rachel K. Miller, Komudi Singh, Khursheed A. Wani and Mike Boxem and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Corkins

19 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark E. Corkins United States 12 285 176 93 87 81 19 621
Geert Depuydt Belgium 9 367 1.3× 384 2.2× 128 1.4× 42 0.5× 12 0.1× 15 703
Marina Kniazeva United States 15 715 2.5× 370 2.1× 160 1.7× 201 2.3× 9 0.1× 20 1.1k
Dana L. Miller United States 13 352 1.2× 303 1.7× 136 1.5× 143 1.6× 8 0.1× 21 788
Alicia N. Minniti Chile 15 244 0.9× 282 1.6× 97 1.0× 17 0.2× 6 0.1× 18 639
Claudia Rudolph Germany 12 410 1.4× 98 0.6× 35 0.4× 29 0.3× 6 0.1× 18 683
Sasha De Henau Belgium 11 273 1.0× 155 0.9× 38 0.4× 15 0.2× 16 0.2× 16 447
Toke P. Krogager Denmark 10 242 0.8× 31 0.2× 154 1.7× 21 0.2× 11 0.1× 12 541
Ryo Higuchi‐Sanabria United States 16 458 1.6× 245 1.4× 36 0.4× 32 0.4× 6 0.1× 42 796
Juan Carlos Fierro-González Sweden 12 521 1.8× 216 1.2× 60 0.6× 14 0.2× 6 0.1× 14 869
Wenxia Zhang China 10 144 0.5× 37 0.2× 71 0.8× 25 0.3× 11 0.1× 21 482

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Corkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Corkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Corkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Corkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Corkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Corkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Corkins. The network helps show where Mark E. Corkins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Corkins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Corkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Corkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Corkins. Mark E. Corkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
2.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2022). A comparative study of cellular diversity between the Xenopus pronephric and mouse metanephric nephron. Kidney International. 103(1). 77–86. 6 indexed citations
3.
Mukherjee, Abhisek, Mark E. Corkins, Sourav Samanta, et al.. (2022). Identification of Multicolor Fluorescent Probes for Heterogeneous Aβ Deposits in Alzheimer’s Disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 13. 802614–802614. 6 indexed citations
4.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2021). The Wnt/PCP formin Daam1 drives cell-cell adhesion during nephron development. Cell Reports. 36(1). 109340–109340. 11 indexed citations
5.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2021). Tissue-Targeted CRISPR–Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing of Multiple Homeologs in F0-Generation Xenopus laevis Embryos. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2022(3). pdb.prot107037–pdb.prot107037. 6 indexed citations
6.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2021). Aquatic models of human ciliary diseases. genesis. 59(1-2). e23410–e23410. 7 indexed citations
7.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2019). Divergent roles of the Wnt/PCP Formin Daam1 in renal ciliogenesis. PLoS ONE. 14(8). e0221698–e0221698. 13 indexed citations
8.
Choi, Sangyong, Ya‐Mei Hu, Mark E. Corkins, Amy E. Palmer, & Amanda Bird. (2018). Zinc transporters belonging to the Cation Diffusion Facilitator (CDF) family have complementary roles in transporting zinc out of the cytosol. PLoS Genetics. 14(3). e1007262–e1007262. 24 indexed citations
9.
Corkins, Mark E., Esther J. Pearl, Moonsup Lee, et al.. (2018). Transgenic Xenopus laevis Line for In Vivo Labeling of Nephrons within the Kidney. Genes. 9(4). 197–197. 10 indexed citations
10.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2017). The gluconate shunt is an alternative route for directing glucose into the pentose phosphate pathway in fission yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 292(33). 13823–13832. 28 indexed citations
11.
Corkins, Mark E., Matthew C. Salanga, Jian Min Deng, et al.. (2017). Tissue-Specific Gene Inactivation inXenopus laevis: Knockout oflhx1in the Kidney with CRISPR/Cas9. Genetics. 208(2). 673–686. 51 indexed citations
12.
Corkins, Mark E., Komudi Singh, Altar Sorkaç, et al.. (2016). C. elegans lifespan extension by osmotic stress requires FUdR, base excision repair, FOXO, and sirtuins. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 154. 30–42. 59 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Junfeng, Bin Li, Weiyu Zhao, et al.. (2016). Two-Photon Near Infrared Fluorescent Turn-On Probe Toward Cysteine and Its Imaging Applications. ACS Sensors. 1(7). 882–887. 110 indexed citations
14.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2014). The Double Zinc Finger Domain and Adjacent Accessory Domain from the Transcription Factor Loss of Zinc Sensing 1 (Loz1) Are Necessary for DNA Binding and Zinc Sensing. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 289(26). 18087–18096. 14 indexed citations
15.
Corkins, Mark E., et al.. (2013). Zinc finger protein Loz1 is required for zinc-responsive regulation of gene expression in fission yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110(38). 15371–15376. 36 indexed citations
16.
Corkins, Mark E., Cole Anderson, Bradley R. Cairns, et al.. (2012). Zinc-dependent Regulation of the adh1 Antisense Transcript in Fission Yeast. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288(2). 759–769. 20 indexed citations
17.
Singh, Komudi, Michael Y. Chao, Hidetoshi Komatsu, et al.. (2011). C. elegans Notch Signaling Regulates Adult Chemosensory Response and Larval Molting Quiescence. Current Biology. 21(10). 825–834. 105 indexed citations
18.
Hyde, Richard M., et al.. (2010). PKC-1 acts with the ERK MAPK signaling pathway to regulate Caenorhabditis elegans mechanosensory response. Genes Brain & Behavior. 10(3). 286–298. 19 indexed citations
19.
Komatsu, Hidetoshi, Michael Y. Chao, Jonah Larkins‐Ford, et al.. (2008). OSM-11 Facilitates LIN-12 Notch Signaling during Caenorhabditis elegans Vulval Development. PLoS Biology. 6(8). e196–e196. 95 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026