Mark de Bel
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management 2
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 2
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance 1
-
- Coastal and Marine Management 2
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development 2
-
- Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration 2
-
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment 1
-
- Climate change impacts on agriculture 1
Mark de Bel
8 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Global and Planetary Change 142
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 64
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 63
- Earth-Surface Processes 22
- Environmental Engineering 30
Countries citing papers authored by Mark de Bel
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark de Bel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark de Bel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark de Bel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark de Bel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark de Bel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark de Bel. The network helps show where Mark de Bel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark de Bel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 91 | |
| 5 | An impact evaluation framework to support planning and evaluation ofnature-based solutions projects. Report prepared by the EKLIPSE Expert Working Group on Nature-based Solutions to Promote Climate Resilience in Urban Areas | 2017 | 34 |
| 6 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 7 | Adapting to Climate Variability | 2011 | 3 |
| 8 | 2011 | 6 |
About Mark de Bel
Mark de Bel is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science and Pollution, having authored 8 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (2 papers), Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (2 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (2 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper) and Climate change impacts on agriculture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (142 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (64 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (63 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (22 citations) and Environmental Engineering (30 citations). Mark de Bel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Hinkel, Alexander Bisaro, Laurens M. Bouwer, Gregorio Sgrigna, Ana Monteiro, Niki Frantzeskaki, Pam Berry, Nadja Kabisch, Corina Başnou and Margaretha Breil. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Sustainability, Climatic Change, Environmental Science & Policy and Open Repository of the University of Porto (University of Porto).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.