Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The gem5 simulator
20113.5k citationsSteven K. Reinhardt, Mark D. Hill et al.profile →
Multifacet's general execution-driven multiprocessor simulator (GEMS) toolset
20051.2k citationsDaniel J. Sorin, Kevin Ezra Moore et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Hill more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Hill. The network helps show where Mark D. Hill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark D. Hill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark D. Hill.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark D. Hill based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark D. Hill. Mark D. Hill is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hill, Mark D., et al.. (2020). MOD. 775–788.40 indexed citations
Sánchez, Daniel, Luke Yen, Mark D. Hill, & Karthikeyan Sankaralingam. (2007). Implementing Signatures for Transactional Memory. International Symposium on Microarchitecture. 123–133.85 indexed citations
Ailamaki, Anastassia, et al.. (2001). Weaving Relations for Cache Performance. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 169–180.216 indexed citations
7.
Hill, Mark D., Norman P. Jouppi, & Gurindar S. Sohi. (2000). Readings in computer architecture. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. eBooks.42 indexed citations
8.
Ailamaki, Anastassia, David J. DeWitt, Mark D. Hill, & David A. Wood. (1999). DBMSs on a Modern Processor: Where Does Time Go?. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 266–277.305 indexed citations
Schoinas, Ioannis, Babak Falsafi, Mark D. Hill, James R. Larus, & David A. Wood. (1998). Sirocco: cost-effective fine-grain distributed shared memory. International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques. 40–49.23 indexed citations
Reinhardt, Steven K., et al.. (1995). The Wisconsin Wind Tunnel: virtual prototyping of parallel computers. Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin). 150–162.45 indexed citations
Gharachorloo, Kourosh, Sarita V. Adve, Anoop Gupta, John L. Hennessy, & Mark D. Hill. (1993). Specifying System Requirements for Memory Consistency Models. Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin).15 indexed citations
18.
Hill, Mark D., James R. Larus, Steven K. Reinhardt, & David A. Wood. (1992). Cooperative Shared Memory: Software and Hardware Support for Scalable Multiprocesors.. 262–273.3 indexed citations
19.
Hill, Mark D. & Alan Jay Smith. (1991). Correction to Evaluating Associativity in CPU Caches. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 40(3). 371.1 indexed citations
20.
Adve, Sarita V. & Mark D. Hill. (1990). Implementing Sequential Consistency in Cache-Based Systems.. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing. 47–50.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.