Mark Cranley

931 total citations
9 papers, 106 citations indexed

About

Mark Cranley is a scholar working on Neurology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Cranley has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 106 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Neurology, 3 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mark Cranley's work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers). Mark Cranley is often cited by papers focused on Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (7 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers). Mark Cranley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Mark Cranley's co-authors include Oliver O’Sullivan, Robert Barker‐Davies, David Holdsworth, Alexander N. Bennett, Jon Naylor, Peter Ladlow, Edward Nicol, Nick P. Talbot, Cheng Xie and James Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Applied Physiology and Injury.

In The Last Decade

Mark Cranley

9 papers receiving 105 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Cranley United Kingdom 6 89 47 27 23 14 9 106
Antonio Ojeda Spain 7 78 0.9× 42 0.9× 16 0.6× 48 2.1× 13 0.9× 23 156
Matthieu Gasnier France 4 104 1.2× 53 1.1× 23 0.9× 34 1.5× 54 3.9× 12 161
Yolanda Ruíz Spain 6 90 1.0× 39 0.8× 26 1.0× 21 0.9× 54 3.9× 16 155
Jon Naylor United Kingdom 6 141 1.6× 59 1.3× 36 1.3× 33 1.4× 23 1.6× 6 155
Cheng Xie United Kingdom 4 118 1.3× 42 0.9× 18 0.7× 28 1.2× 43 3.1× 4 139
Marcello Tritto Italy 4 75 0.8× 37 0.8× 15 0.6× 26 1.1× 41 2.9× 4 100
John M. Baratta United States 4 160 1.8× 58 1.2× 46 1.7× 49 2.1× 55 3.9× 11 191
Julianne Hall United States 4 123 1.4× 38 0.8× 13 0.5× 22 1.0× 59 4.2× 7 157
S Walker United Kingdom 4 77 0.9× 38 0.8× 13 0.5× 26 1.1× 17 1.2× 7 102
Laura Patrizi Italy 2 107 1.2× 57 1.2× 24 0.9× 25 1.1× 47 3.4× 3 115

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cranley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cranley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cranley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cranley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cranley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cranley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cranley. The network helps show where Mark Cranley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Cranley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Cranley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Cranley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Cranley. Mark Cranley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
O’Sullivan, Oliver, David Holdsworth, Peter Ladlow, et al.. (2023). Cardiopulmonary, Functional, Cognitive and Mental Health Outcomes Post-COVID-19, Across the Range of Severity of Acute Illness, in a Physically Active, Working-Age Population. Sports Medicine - Open. 9(1). 7–7. 8 indexed citations
2.
Ladlow, Peter, Robert Barker‐Davies, Saraj Bahadur, et al.. (2023). Changing characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome: Cross-sectional findings from 458 consultations using the Stanford Hall remote rehabilitation assessment tool. BMJ Military Health. 170(6). 477–483. 3 indexed citations
3.
Ladlow, Peter, David Holdsworth, Oliver O’Sullivan, et al.. (2023). Exercise tolerance, fatigue, mental health, and employment status at 5 and 12 months following COVID-19 illness in a physically trained population. Journal of Applied Physiology. 134(3). 622–637. 15 indexed citations
4.
Holdsworth, David, Robert Barker‐Davies, Oliver O’Sullivan, et al.. (2022). Comprehensive clinical assessment identifies specific neurocognitive deficits in working-age patients with long-COVID. PLoS ONE. 17(6). e0267392–e0267392. 41 indexed citations
5.
Holdsworth, David, Robert Barker‐Davies, Oliver O’Sullivan, et al.. (2022). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing excludes significant disease in patients recovering from COVID-19. BMJ Military Health. 170(4). 308–314. 5 indexed citations
6.
O’Sullivan, Oliver, Robert Barker‐Davies, Saraj Bahadur, et al.. (2021). Rehabilitation post-COVID-19: cross-sectional observations using the Stanford Hall remote assessment tool. BMJ Military Health. 169(3). 243–248. 20 indexed citations
7.
O’Sullivan, Oliver, Robert Barker‐Davies, Michael Gough, et al.. (2021). The Stanford Hall coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remote rehabilitation assessment tool. Future Healthcare Journal. 8. S28–S28. 2 indexed citations
9.
Cranley, Mark, et al.. (2015). Antiepileptic prophylaxis following severe traumatic brain injury within a military cohort. Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 162(2). 109–114. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026