Mark Clendenning
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 50
- Oncology 39
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 32
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 12
- Co-authors
- Daniel D. Buchanan (46 shared papers)Mark A. Jenkins (42 shared papers)John L. Hopper (33 shared papers)Christophe Rosty (36 shared papers)Albert de la Chapelle (9 shared papers)Heather Hampel (5 shared papers)Aung Ko Win (28 shared papers)Kaisa Sotamaa (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Familial Cancer (11 papers)Human Mutation (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)Genetics in Medicine (2 papers)Modern Pathology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark Clendenning
60 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Mark Clendenning's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.1k
- Cancer Research 1.1k
- Oncology 1.8k
- Genetics 412
- Surgery 419
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Clendenning
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Clendenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Clendenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Clendenning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Clendenning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Clendenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Clendenning. The network helps show where Mark Clendenning may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Clendenning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feasibility of Screening for Lynch Syndrome Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 612 |
| 2 | 2008 | 377 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 166 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 147 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 126 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 122 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 105 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 104 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 76 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 39 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 34 |
About Mark Clendenning
Mark Clendenning is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (50 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (32 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (26 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (12 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.1k citations), Cancer Research (1.1k citations), Oncology (1.8k citations), Genetics (412 citations) and Surgery (419 citations). Mark Clendenning has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark A. Jenkins, John L. Hopper, Christophe Rosty, Albert de la Chapelle, Heather Hampel, Aung Ko Win, Kaisa Sotamaa, Joanne Young and Graham G. Giles. Their work appears in journals such as Familial Cancer, Human Mutation, PLoS ONE, Genetics in Medicine and Modern Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.