Mark Charman
About
In The Last Decade
Mark Charman
9 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Molecular Biology 238
- Cell Biology 131
- Physiology 88
- Surgery 83
- Epidemiology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Charman
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Charman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Charman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Charman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Charman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Charman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Charman. The network helps show where Mark Charman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Charman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Charman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Charman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Charman. Mark Charman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 53 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 161 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.