Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Caleb Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Caleb Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Caleb Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Caleb Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Caleb Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Caleb Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Caleb Smith. The network helps show where Mark Caleb Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Caleb Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Caleb Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Caleb Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Caleb Smith. Mark Caleb Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Mark Caleb. (2020). "Ohio Has Taken a Different Turn": Ohio No Longer Appears to Be a Swing State. DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University).
Smith, Mark Caleb, et al.. (2006). Religiosity, Secularism, and Social Health: A Research Note. DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University). 8.2 indexed citations
9.
Hamilton, J. Brooke, et al.. (2005). Creating an Ethical Culture as a Strategic Advantage for Global Growth: A Conversation with Archie Dunham, Former Chairman of ConocoPhillips. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 10(4). 82.4 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Mark Caleb & Mark Smith. (2001). Enhancing Evolution Education Through K-12 Curriculum Development and Public Outreach. AGUFM. 2001.
11.
Smith, Mark Caleb. (2000). Across the Page and Down the Dial: Media Usage and Evaluations of the Christian Coalition. Social Science Quarterly. 81(3). 855–867.
12.
Schempp, Paul G., Sandor Dorgo, Tina J. Hall, Wenhao Liu, & Mark Caleb Smith. (2000). A Review of Curriculum Scholarship in Physical Education (1998-2000): Analyzing Innovations. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 37(3). 84.1 indexed citations
Hamilton, J. Brooke, Mark Caleb Smith, Ronald B. Heady, & Paula Phillips Carson. (1997). Using Open-Ended Questions on Senior Exit Surveys To Evaluate and Improve Faculty Performance: Results from a School of Business Administration.. Journal on excellence in college teaching. 8(1). 23–48.3 indexed citations
15.
Howes, Tony & Mark Caleb Smith. (1996). An LDAP URL Format. RFC. 1959. 1–4.3 indexed citations
Walsh, John, Jeremy Gregory, Mark Caleb Smith, et al.. (1993). The Church of England c.1689–c.1833. Cambridge University Press eBooks.34 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Mark Caleb. (1982). Progress of the US hot-dry-rock program. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 82. 31799.1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Mark Caleb & John Clarke. (1980). Recreating Liberal Education: Student-Designed Programming after a Decade.. Liberal education. 66(3).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.